期刊文献+

从定罪的“证明标准”到定罪量刑的“证据标准”——新《刑事诉讼法》对定罪证明标准的丰富与发展 被引量:21

From “Proof Standard” of Conviction to “Evidence Standard” of Conviction and Sentence——Abundance and Development of Proof Standard of Conviction in the new “Criminal Procedural Law”
原文传递
导出
摘要 1996年刑事诉讼法只有定罪的证明标准,没有规定量刑的证明标准。多年来,理论界围绕定罪的证明标准展开热烈的讨论,实务界也进行了积极的探索。新《刑事诉讼法》首次对"证据确实、充分"从三个方面作出解释。本文认为该规定已从原来定罪的证明标准发展为定罪量刑的证据标准,是新《刑事诉讼法》对定罪证明标准的丰富与发展。 In the current Criminal Procedural Law in China, there is only proof standard of conviction, but no proof standard of sentence. In the past years, the theory field has been launching an ardent discussion on proof standard of conviction, and the practice field also has been making an active exploration. The new Criminal Pro- cedural Law gives an explanation of "accurate and sufficient evidence" from three aspects for the first time. This paper argues that this provision has already developed the former proof standard of conviction to the evidence standard of conviction and sentence. The new Criminal ProceduralLaw has made contributions to the development of proof standard of conviction.
作者 顾永忠
出处 《证据科学》 CSSCI 2012年第2期146-154,共9页 Evidence Science
关键词 定罪 量刑 证明标准 证据标准 Conviction, Sentence, Proof standard, Evidence standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1樊崇义;锁正杰;吴宏耀.刑事证据前沿问题研究[A]北京:中国检察出版社,2000208209.
  • 2陈光中.刑事诉讼法[M]北京:北京大学出版社;北京:高等教育出版社,2009171.
  • 3李玉华.诉讼证明标准研究[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,201017.
  • 4卞建林.刑事诉讼法学[M]北京:科学出版社,2008507.
  • 5顾永忠.中国疑难刑事名案程序与证据问题研究[M]北京:北京大学出版社,20083680.
  • 6卞建林.刑事诉讼法学[M]北京:科学出版社,2008507-521.
  • 7刘金友.证据法学[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001315.
  • 8李玉华.诉讼证明标准研究[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,201015-17.
  • 9李训虎.悖论状态中的死刑案件证明标准[J].政法论坛,2011,29(4):74-85. 被引量:16
  • 10卞建林.刑事诉讼法学[M]北京:科学出版社,2008.

二级参考文献30

共引文献238

同被引文献166

引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部