期刊文献+

甲基化特异性MLPA技术在Prader-Willi综合征诊断中的应用价值

Value of methylation-specific mutiplex ligation-dependent probe in the diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的不同发病机制的Prader-Willi综合征(PWS)在临床表现、预后和遗传风险上均存在一定差异,目前临床常用的确诊方法甲基化特异性PCR(MS-PCR)不能区分发病机制,本研究采用甲基化特异性多重连接依赖的探针扩增(MS-MLPA)技术诊断PWS,探讨其在诊断以及分辨发病机制上的优势。方法采用系统对照的方法,取经临床MS-PCR检查的30例患儿的外周血样本,其中包括通过MS-PCR确诊为PWS的病例16例,阴性对照病例14例,重新提取DNA,采用MS-MLPA试剂盒Me028进行基因检测分析。结果 MS-MLPA检测结果与MS-PCR检测结果一致,且检测出16例PWS病例中4例源于母源性同源二倍体,12例源于父源性15q11-q13区域缺失。结论 MS-MLPA是能鉴别PWS发病机制的一种可靠的实验诊断方法。 Objective Prader-Willi syndrome(PWS) with different pathogenesis has different clinical manifestations,prognosis and genetic risks.Pathogenesis of the disease cannot be explained by conventional diagnostic method MS-PCR.This study employed methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification(MS-MLPA) for the diagnosis of PWS in order to explore the role of this method in the diagnosis and assessment of pathogenesis of PWS. Methods A system antithetical method was employed.Peripheral blood samples were collected from 30 children for MS-PCR.Of the 30 children,16 were diagnosed with PWS by MS-PCR and the other 14 showed negative MS-PCR.MS-MLPA kit Me028 was used to detect DNA extracted from the 30 samples. Results The results showed by MS-MLPA and MS-PCR were identical.MS-MLPA demonstrated that 4 cases were maternal uniparental disomy and 12 cases were paternal dfeletion in 15q11-q13 region. Conclusions MS-MLPA is a reliable method of genetic testing for PWS which can distinguish pathogenesis of PWS.
出处 《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期445-448,共4页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
关键词 PRADER-WILLI综合征 甲基化特异性PCR 甲基化特异性MLPA 儿童 Prader-Willi syndrome; Methylation-specific PCR; Methylation-specific MLPA; Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J (2008). Mechanisms of Imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman Region. Am J Med Genet Part A 146A, 2041-2052.
  • 2Cassidy S B, Driscoll D J (2009). Prader-Willi syndrome. EurJ Hum Genet 17, 3-13.
  • 3Butler J V, Whittington J E, Holland A J, et al. (2002) Prevalence of, and risk factors for, physical ill-health in people with Prader-Willi syndrome: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neuro144, 248-255.
  • 4Butler M G; Fischer W, Kibiryeva N, et al. (2008). Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis in Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A 146, 854-860.
  • 5Ylstra B, van den Ijssel P, Carvalho B, et al. (2006). BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). Nucleic Acids Res 34(2), 445-450.
  • 6Fridman C, Varela M C, Kok F, et al. (2000). Prader-Willi syndrome: genetic tests and clinical findings. Genet Test 4(4), 387-392.
  • 7Munce T, Simpson R, Bowling F (2008). Molecular Characterization of Prader-Willi Syndrome by Real-Time PCR. Genet Test 12(2), 319-324.
  • 8Bittel D C, Kibiryeva N, Butler M G (2007). Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis of subjects with chromosome 15 abnormalities. Genet Test 11(4), 467-475.
  • 9Gabbett M T, Peters G B, Carmichael J M, et al. (2008). Prader-Willi syndrome phenocopy due to duplication of Xq21.1-q21,31, with array CGH of the critical region. Clin Genet 73, 353-359.
  • 10Bonaglia M C, Ciccone R, Gimelli G, et al. (2008). Detailed phenotype-genotype study in five patients with chromosome 6q16 deletion: narrowing the critical region for Prader-Willi-like phenotype. EurJHum Genet 16, 1443-1449.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部