期刊文献+

乳腺专用磁共振成像、乳腺X线摄影及超声检查对乳腺癌诊断价值的对照研究 被引量:39

The Diagnostic Value of Dedicated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer: Comparative Study with Digital Mammography and Ultrasound
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性比较研究乳腺专用磁共振成像(dedicated breast magnetic resonance imaging,DBMRI)、超声(ultrasound,US)及乳腺X线摄影(mammography,MG)3种检查方法对乳腺癌的诊断价值。方法搜集我院行手术治疗并于术前同时行DBMRI、MG及US 3种检查的患者共612例,剔除36例于检查时已行新辅助化疗的患者,共576例患者纳入本研究,所有入组患者均以病理学结果作为金标准。数据分析与统计采用SPSS 13.0统计软件。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 DBMR对乳腺癌病灶检出的敏感性为97.1%,高于MG(77.6%)(χ2=53.904,P=0.000)及US(91.0%)(χ2=10.370,P=0.001);MG对乳腺癌病灶检出的特异性为88.8%,高于DB-MR(82.8%)(χ2=3.925,P=0.048)及US(82.5%)(χ2=4.383,P=0.036)。对于导管内癌,DBMRI检出的敏感性为97.9%,高于US(77.8%)(χ2=29.445,P=0.000)及MG(71.1%)(χ2=9.680,P=0.002)。在致密型乳腺中,DBMRI诊断灵敏度高为96.0%,高于MG(66.7%)(χ2=35.806,P=0.000);US诊断敏感性为92.1%,高于MG(66.7%)(χ2=24.812,P=0.000)。在非致密型乳腺中,DBMR诊断敏感性为97.9%,高于MG(85%)(χ2=19.684,P=0.000)及US(90.4%)(χ2=19.684,P=0.002)。DBMRI、MG、US对伴钙化的乳腺癌检出的敏感性分别为98.3%、94.0%和94.8%。结论 DBMRI对乳腺癌的检出敏感性高,但特异性较低;对于导管内癌的诊断,DBMRI具有显著优势;在致密型乳腺乳腺癌的检出中,DBMRI与US均具有高敏感性,优于MG。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the diagnostic value of dedicated breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DBMRI) in diagnosing breast cancer by comparing with Mammography(MG) and ultrasound(US). Methods A total of 612 patients underwent preoperative DBMRI, MG, and US examination were collected and 36 cases received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before the examination were excluded. The remaining 576 cases were included to be analyzed using pathological consequences as the golden criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows. P value less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results For detecting breast cancinoma, DBMRI had higher sensitivity (97.1% ) than MG(77.6% ) ( χ2 = 53. 904,P = 0. 000) and US (91.0%) ( χ2 = 10. 370, P = 0. 001 ). MG had higher specificity ( 88.8% ) than DBMRI ( 82.8% ) (χ2 = 3. 925, P = 0. 048 ) and US ( 82.5% ) ( χ2 = 4. 383, P = 0. 036 ). For detecting DCIS, DBMRI had higher sensitivity(97.9% ) than US(77.8% ) ( χ2 = 29. 445 ,P = 0. 000) and MG(71.1% ) ( χ2 = 9. 680 ,P = 0. 002). For detecting breast carcinoma in dense breast patients, the sensitivity of DBMRI (96.0%) and US (92.1%) was higher than MG(66.7% ). For detecting breast carcinoma in non dense breast patients, the sensitivity of DBMRI (97.9%) was higher than MG(85% ) (χ2 = 19. 684,P =0. 000) and US(90.4% ) (χ2 = 19. 684,P =0. 002). The sensitivity of DBMRI, MG, and US in detecting breast cancer with calcifications was 98.3% , 94.0%, and 94.8%.Conclusion Compared with MG and US, DBMRI has a higher sensitivity and lower specificity in detecting breast cancer. It has more valuable than MG and US in diagnosing DCIS. DBMRI and US have a higher sensitivity in detecting breast cancer in dense breasts than MG.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期794-799,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81171389)
关键词 乳腺专用磁共振成像 乳腺X线摄影 超声 乳腺癌 致密型乳腺 Dedicated breast magnetic resonance imaging Mammography Ultrasound Breast cancer Dense breast
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Rebecca S, Elizabeth W, Otis B, et al. The impact of eliminating so- cioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61:212.
  • 2Ting-Kai Leung, Pai-Jung Huang, Chi-Ming Lee, et al. Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstrate Characteristic Findings of Preoperative Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Taiwan Residents Women? Asian Journal of Surgery ,2010,33 : 143.
  • 3American College of Radiology(ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4thed, Reston : American Cofiege of Radiol- ogy, 2003,1.
  • 4Alexander H, Andrea T, Marcus S, et al. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR,2002,179 : 1493.
  • 5Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Pre- operative Assessment of Breast Cancer. Radiology,2004,233:830.
  • 6Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cane-er: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asympto- matic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A system- atic review. BMC Cancer,2009,9:335.
  • 7Nagao Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sugiyama Y, et al. Relationship between mammographie density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women : a case-control study. Breast Cancer,2003,10:228.
  • 8Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2003,12:332.
  • 9van Gils CH, Otten JD, Hendriks JH, et al. High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen, 1999,6:200.
  • 10Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting loci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast patho- logic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgeno1,2004,183: 1149.

二级参考文献16

  • 1顾雅佳.规范乳腺X线报告[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(9):903-905. 被引量:46
  • 2Emster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, et al. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA, 1996,275:913-918.
  • 3Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, et al. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer, 1996, 77:2267-2274.
  • 4Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15:2010-2017.
  • 5Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid B, et al. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR marnmography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Badiol, 2003, 76:3-12.
  • 6American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaning reporting and data system (BI-RADS) . 4th ed, Reston: Am College Radiol, 2003 : 1-259.
  • 7Morris EA. Illustrated breast MR lexicon. Semin Roentgenol,2001, 36: 238-249.
  • 8Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology, 2004, 233 :830-849.
  • 9Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrastenhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology, 1999, 213:881-888.
  • 10Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AIR, 2003, 181:519-525.

共引文献42

同被引文献339

引证文献39

二级引证文献316

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部