期刊文献+

经肱动脉行椎动脉支架成形术治疗椎动脉狭窄 被引量:2

Effect of vertebral artery stent angioplasty through brachial artery route
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经肱动脉行椎动脉支架置入术的可行性、安全性及优缺点。方法:选取同期行椎动脉支架置入术的患者23例,按入路血管分为肱动脉组(5例)和股动脉组(18例),对比其穿刺成功率、手术成功率、手术时间、X线照射时间、并发症发生率,并进行统计学处理。结果:两组穿刺成功率、手术成功率均为100%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肱动脉组手术时间、X射线照射时间长于股动脉组,达到90min以及60min(P<0.05);但肱动脉组无并发症发生,其并发症发生率低于股动脉组,并发症发生率11%(P<0.05)。结论:经肱动脉行椎动脉支架置入术安全可行,并发症少且轻微,可以作为椎动脉支架置入术的选择入路之一。 Objective:To investigate the feasibility, safety, advantages and disadvantages of vertebral artery stent an gioplasty by the way of brachial artery. Methods: The vertebral artery stent angioplasty was performed in 23 patients and they were divided into brachial artery group(n= 13)and femoral artery group (n= 10). The success ratios of puncture and procedure, the operation time, X-ray exposure time and complication were compared and analysed. Results: There were no differences in the puncture success rate and procedure success rate between the two groups (P〉0.05). The operation time and the X-ray exposure time were significantly longer, which were 90mins and 60mins. and the complication rate (0) was obviously lower in brachial artery group than those in femoral artery group (11 %) (P〈0.05). Conclusion:The way of bra chial artery for vertebral artery stent angioplasty is safe,feasible with few complications. So the brachial artery may be re garded as one of alternative way for vertebral artery stent angioplasty.
出处 《放射学实践》 2012年第6期661-664,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 椎动脉 支架 肱动脉 Vertebral artery Stents Brachial artery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Wong KS, Li H, Lam WW, et al. Progression of middle cerebral artery occlusive disease and its relationship with further vascular events after stroke[J]. Stroke,2002,33(2) :532-536.
  • 2Feldmann E,Daneault N,Kwan E,et al. Chinese-white differences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease[J]. Neu- rology,1990,40(10) :1541 -1545.
  • 3Coward IJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Percutaneous translu minal angio -plasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis[J]. Strok,2005,36(9) :2047 -2048.
  • 4North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Col- laborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symp- tomatic patients with highgrade cartid stenosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 1991,325(2) :445-453.
  • 5Campau. Lpereutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angi oraphy[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1989,16 (1) : 327.
  • 6刘令强,吉训明.经桡动脉途径穿刺全脑血管造影60例临床分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2007,16(5):351-353. 被引量:30
  • 7李建明,贾广志,尹华,王学静.经桡动脉和股动脉途径行脑血管造影的对比分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2008,17(8):587-589. 被引量:10

二级参考文献13

共引文献35

同被引文献47

  • 1VETROVEC G W. Radial angioplasty:feasible but should this be the standard ? [ J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent, 1999,46: 42-42.
  • 2KIEMENEIJ F, LAARN1EN Q J, ODEKERKEN D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angiopl asty by the radial, brachial, and femoral approaches : the access study[J]. J Am Con Cardiol,1997,29(6) :1269-1275.
  • 3STELLA P R, KIEMENEIJI F, LAARMAN G J, et al. Inci- dence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transra- dial artery coronary angplasty [ J ]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997,40(2) :156-158.
  • 4LOUVARD Y, KROL M, PREZZANO M, et al. Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography: a single operator's experience[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,1999,11:543-548.
  • 5ANDEW A R, NICHOLAS M R, RICHAND J S. Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary in- tervention[J]. BMJ ,2004,329:443-446.
  • 6GALLI M, ZERBONI S, POLITI A, et al. Transradial approach for coronary procedures initial experience and result [ J ]. G hal Cardial, 1998,28 (7) :767-772.
  • 7PIERFRANCESCO A, GIUSEPPE G, SMITHS R, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2004,44 (2) :349-356.
  • 8CAMPEAU L. Pereutaneous radial approach for coronary angi- ography[ J]. Cathet Caldiovasc Diagn, 1989,16( 1 ) :3-7.
  • 9KIEMNEIJ F, LAARMAN F J. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation [ J ]. Catllet Cardi- wvasc Diagn, 1993,30(40) :35-35.
  • 10JOLLY S S, AMLANI S, HAMON M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events:a system- atic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [ J ]. Am Heart J,2009,157(1) :132-140.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部