期刊文献+

基于管型空域配置的交通复杂性管理 被引量:8

Air Traffic Complexity Management in with Tube-type Airspace Configuration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 空域的动态配置能力将为空中交通管理提供异质的空域框架,主动适应空中交通增长的复杂特性。管型空域是在繁忙区域中建立的低交通阻抗通道,是实现空域动态配置能力的重要途径和主要研究方向。就转变的空域/交通适应性关系分析了配置管型空域的必要性,分别建立了基本型管型空域模型与增强型管型空域模型。采用基于连携性的交通复杂性测度指标作为空域性能的评价基础,相比无约束的运行空域,管型空域可在维持相同流量的条件下显著降低空中交通的复杂性。针对两类管型空域模型,讨论了基于流调配的交通复杂性管理策略。多向管型空域中各单向管型空域的交通特征显著分化,因此,相应的交通复杂性管理策略须建立在对各管运行情况细致分析的基础上,才能实现交通吞吐量与其复杂性间的最佳权衡。 The ability of dynamic airspace configuration provides a heterogeneous airspace framework for proactively dealing with increasing complexity of air traffic in air transportation system. As one of effective ways to increase that ability, the tube-type airspace allocation provides a low traffic-resistant corridor within dense airspace. We analyze the adaptable interaction between airspace and traffic behavior under high density operation environment. A basic tube model and an enhanced tube model were developed, and are used to discuss complexity management strategies based on the traffic flow adjustment and alliance effects related air traffic complexity metric. Simulation results indicate the tube is more suitable for future operation in air traffic management for its capability to accommodate higher air traffic with lower complexity compared by the unconstraint airspace. There exist distinct characteristics among different single tubes in the enhanced tube model, so that a trade-off decision between both throughputs of the airspace and the complexity thereof may be accomplished by specific complexity management strategies with exact analysis subject to the operational states of each tube. The results provide an acceptable and feasible way to accomplish dynamic airspace configuration.
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 2012年第3期327-335,351,共10页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家空管科研课题(GKG200802006)
关键词 空中交通管理 空中交通管制 动态空域配置 空域建模 复杂性 管理决策支持 air traffic management air traffic control dynamic airspace configuration airspace modeling complexity management and decision support
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Swenson H, Barhydt R, Landis M. Next generation air transportation system ( NGATS ) air traffic management-airspace project [R]. NASA Reference Material, 2006.
  • 2吕小平.中国民航新一代空中交通管理系统发展总体框架[J].中国民用航空,2007(8):24-26. 被引量:26
  • 3Zhang C, Zhang J, Hu M H. Air traffic complexity based on alliance effects [C]//28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference ( DASC ). Florida: Orlando, 2009:7. A. 1-1-7. A. 1 9.
  • 4Zhang J, modeling Avionics Orlando, Zhang C, Hu M H. Airspace behavior considering flight intent [C]//28th Digital Systems Conference 2009..7. A. 2-1 7. A. 2 ( DASC ). Florida 10.
  • 5Kopardekar P, Bilimoria K D, Sridhar B. Initial concepts for dynamic airspace configuration[C]//7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO). Northern Ireland.. Belfast, 2007.
  • 6Lee P U, Mercer J, Gore B F. Examining airspace structural components and configuration practices for dynamic airspace configuration[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Hawaii.. Honolulu, 2008.
  • 7Leiden K, Kamienski S, Kopardekar P. Initial implications of automation on dynamic airspace configuration[C]//7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO). Northern Ireland: Belfast, 2007.
  • 8Sridhar B, Grabbe S, Sheth K, etal. Initial study of tube networks for flexible airspace utilization[C]// AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Colorado: Keystone, 2006.
  • 9Hoffman R, Prete J. Principles of airspace tube design for dynamic airspace configuration[C]//26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS). Alaska: Anchorage, 2008.
  • 10张进,胡明华,张晨.空中交通管理中的复杂性研究[J].航空学报,2009,30(11):2132-2142. 被引量:69

二级参考文献35

  • 1Mogford R H, Guttman J A, Morrow S L, et al. The complexity construct in air traffic control: a review and synthesis of the literature[R]. DOT/FAA/CT-TN95/22, 1995.
  • 2Edmons B. Syntactic measures of complexity[D]. Manchester: University of Manchester, 1999.
  • 3Histon J M, Hansman R J, Aigoin G, et al. Introducing structural considerations into complexity metrics[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2002, 10(2) : 115-130.
  • 4Histon J M, Hansman R J. The impact of structure on cognitive complexity in air traffic control[R]. MIT International Center for Air Transportation Rep. No. ICAT- 2002 4, 2002.
  • 5Cilliers P, Complexity and postmodernism [ M]. New York: Routledge, 1998:8- 10.
  • 6FAA. FAA's NextGen implementation plan[R]. Washington, D.C. : FAA, 2008.
  • 7Swenson H, Barhydt R, Landis M. Next generation air transportation system (NGATS) air traffic managementairspace project[R]. NASA Reference Material, 2006.
  • 8SESAR Consortium. SESAR master plan D5[R]. EUEO- CONTROL DLM 0710-001-02-00, 2008.
  • 9RTCA. Final report of RTCA task force :3: free flight iraplementation[R]. Washington, D.C. : RTCA Inc, 1995.
  • 10FAA. The measure of air traffic control sector complexity for the en route environment: phase Ⅱ experiment plan [R/OL]. [2008-09 -18]. http: //www. tc. faa. gov/ acb300/330 documents dd. asp.

共引文献93

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部