期刊文献+

兼并重组企业管理团队异质性与隐性知识关系研究 被引量:2

Research on Relationship of Heterogeneity of Management Team and Tacit Knowledge for Companies after Merger and Restructuring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产业结构调整使得企业兼并、重组的步伐加快,提升管理团队管理水平成为当前重要的研究课题。实现管理团队内部异质性的匹配对提高团队管理水平有非常重要的影响,而管理水平的高低由管理者隐性知识水平决定。本文提出了管理团队成员特征的一般异质性和专长异质性与隐性知识水平构建模型,通过对兼并重组企业的调查研究,结果显示,年龄异质性、专业异质性、教育异质性等对隐性知识水平有积极作用,任期异质性对管理他人的隐性知识水平和能力产生不利影响。 As the industrial structure adjustment accelerates the pace of company merger and restructuring, the improve- ment of level of management team becomes an important research issue currently. The internal matching of heterogeneity of management team may exert crucial importance on the management level of the team, but the level of management may be subject to the level of tacit knowledge of managers. This paper puts forward a model about general heterogeneities and special heterogeneities of those members and the level of tacit knowledge, and then carries out the research on those companies. The results indicate that the heterogeneity of age, professional and education, etc. may correlate with level of tacit knowledge positively, but the heterogeneity of service term may exert unfavorable influence on the level and capacity of tacit knowledge on managing others.
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期186-189,共4页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 郑州市软科学研究计划项目"郑州市兼并重组企业管理团队协同正效应研究"(20111260)
关键词 团队异质性 隐性知识 团队管理水平 team heterogeneity tacit knowledge level of management of team
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1POLANYI. The Tacit Dimension [ M]. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1966.
  • 2JACKSON S E, A JOSHI, N L ERHARDT. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications [J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29 (6) : 801 -830.
  • 3PELLED L H, EISENHARDT K M, XIN K R. Exploring the blackbox: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and' performanoe [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44:1 - 28.
  • 4KNIGHT D, PEARCE C L, SMITH K G, OLIAN J D, SIMS H P, SMITH K A, FLOOD P. Top management team diversity, group process and strategic consensus [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20 : 445 - 465.
  • 5张钢,熊立.成员异质性与团队绩效:以交互记忆系统为中介变量[J].科研管理,2009,30(1):71-80. 被引量:53
  • 6JEHN K A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict [ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40 : 256 - 282.
  • 7WAGNER R K. Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behaviour [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 19871 52 (6) : 1236 - 1247.
  • 8STERNBERG R J, HEDLUND JENNIFER. Practical intelligence , g , and work psychology [ J ]. Human Performance, 2002 , 15 (1/2) : 143 - 160.
  • 9STERNBERG R J, HORVATH J A. Tacit knowledge in professional practice : Researcher and practitioner perspectives [ M ]. Mahwah N J : LErlbaum , 1999.
  • 10KERR MARJORY R. Tacit knowledge as a predictor of managerial success : A field study [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science , 1995 , 27 (1) : 36.

二级参考文献48

  • 1张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量:67
  • 2Bowers, C. A. , J, A. Pharmer, & E. Salas. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta- analysis[ J]. Small Group Research, 2000, 31 (3) : 305 -327.
  • 3Webber, S. S. and L. M. Donahue. Impact of highly and less job - related diversity on workgroup cohesion and performance: A meta - analysis [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(2) : 141 -162.
  • 4Pelled, L. H., K. M. Eisenhardt, & K. R. Xin. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44:1 -28.
  • 5Milliken H. J., & L. L. Martins. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21:402 -433.
  • 6Jackson, S. E. , A. Joshi, & N. L. Erhardt. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications[ J]. Journal of Management, 2003,29(6) : 801 - 830.
  • 7Knight, D, C. L. Pearee, K. G. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims, K. A. Smith, & P. Flood. Top management team diversity, group process and strategic consensus[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20:445 -465.
  • 8Ancona, D. G. , & D. F. Caldwell. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37:634-665.
  • 9Jehn, K. A., G. B. Northcraft, & M. A. Neale. Why differences make a difference : A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44 : 741 -763.
  • 10Katzenbach, J. & D. Smith. The Wisdom of Teams [ M ]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.

共引文献55

同被引文献30

  • 1刘嘉,许燕.团队异质性研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):636-640. 被引量:52
  • 2张钢,方珑.知识冲突与团队绩效:一个实证研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(6):12-21. 被引量:26
  • 3朱学红,胡艳,黄健柏,杨涛.科技创新团队心理契约的违背与重建[J].预测,2007,26(6):14-21. 被引量:14
  • 4Barnett W P,Caldwe D F,O’Reilly C A. Work Group Demography,Social Integration,and Turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(1):21-37.
  • 5Cunningham G B. The LGBT advantage:Examining the relationship among sexual orientation diversity,diversity strategy,and performance. Sport Management Review,2011,14(14):453-461.
  • 6Gardner H K,Gino F. Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams:transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(4):988-1022.
  • 7Hans van Dijka,Marloes L van Engena,Daan van Knippenberg. Defying conventional wisdom:A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2012,119(1):38-53.
  • 8Hansen M T,Hass M T. Different knowledge,different benefits:toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organization. Academy of Management Proceeding,2007,28(11):1133–1153.
  • 9Jakob Lauring,Jan Selmer. Diversity attitudes and group knowledge processing in multicultural organizations. European Management Journal,2013,31(2):124-136.
  • 10Jehn K A,Northcraft G B,Neale M A. Why Differences Make a Difference:A Field Study of Diversity,Conflict,and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(4):741-763.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部