期刊文献+

典型草原健康评价的VOR和CVOR指数 被引量:35

VOR and CVOR Index for Health Evaluation of Typical Steppe in Inner Mongolia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确定量评价围封禁牧对草原生态系统健康的影响,以内蒙古太仆寺旗境内植被组成一致(以羊草(Ley-mus chinensis)+克氏针茅(Stipa krylovii)草原为主)、土壤类型相同的自由放牧样地和围封样地为研究对象,开展自由放牧和围封禁牧对典型草原健康影响的VOR和CVOR指数评价,建立典型草原健康评价的VOR和CVOR综合指数的计算模型,并用于不同围封年限典型草原的健康评价。结果表明:VOR和CVOR综合指数均可准确评价不同围封禁牧年限典型草原的健康状况,两者具有基本一致的评价结果。典型草原在围封恢复演替过程中,尽管草地基况(C)、活力(V)、组织力(O)和恢复力(R)变化各异,但围封禁牧后草地的VOR和CVOR综合指数均随围封禁牧年限的延长呈逐渐增加的变化趋势,草地的健康等级由未围封和围封前期的"警戒"等级逐步恢复演替至"健康"(围封13~20年)等级,表明围封有利于退化草地生态系统的健康恢复。 Effects of fencing on the health of grassland ecosystem in open-grazing land and fenced-land with the same vegetation composition(Leymus chinensis and Stipa krylovii are main species) and soil type are reported.Calculation models for VOR and CVOR index were created and their indices used to evaluate the health of typical steppes fenced in different years.Results showed that VOR and CVOR indices could accurately evaluate the health of typical steppe ecosystems fenced in different years.The evaluation results of both indices were quite consistent.The condition(C),vigor(V),organization(O) and resilience(R) of typical steppe in the restoration succession had different change patterns,whereas VOR and CVOR indices showed the same change tendency to increase gradually with prolonged fencing.The health condition of typical steppe was increased from "threshold" level to "health" level after fenced 13 years showing that the implement of fencing was beneficial to the health recovery of degraded grassland ecosystem.
出处 《草地学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期401-406,共6页 Acta Agrestia Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究"973"项目(2007CB106800)资助
关键词 典型草原 放牧 围封 健康评价 VOR指数 CVOR指数 Typical steppe Health evaluation Grazing Fencing VOR index CVOR index
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1王立新,刘钟龄,刘华民,王炜,梁存柱,乔江,中越信和.内蒙古典型草原生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):544-550. 被引量:57
  • 2侯扶江,于应文,傅华,朱宗元,刘钟龄.阿拉善草地健康评价的CVOR指数[J].草业学报,2004,13(4):117-126. 被引量:50
  • 3Fairweather P G. Determining the 'health’ of estuaries:priorities for ecological research [J].Australian Journal of Ecology, 1999,24(4):441-448.
  • 4Allen E. Forest health assessment in Canada [J].Ecosystem Health,2001,7(1):28-34.
  • 5Niyogi D K, Simon K S, Townsend C R. Breakdown of tussock grass in streams along a gradient of agricultural development in New Zealand [J].Freshwater Biology,2003,48(9): 1698-1708.
  • 6Tait J TP, Cresswell I D, Lawson R, et al.Auditing the health of Australia’s ecosystems [J].Ecosystem Health, 2000,6(2):149-158.
  • 7任继周,南志标,郝敦元.草业系统中的界面论[J].草业学报,2000,9(1):1-8. 被引量:136
  • 8Costanza R, Mageau M T. What is a healthy ecosystems [J].Aquatic Ecology,1999,33(1):105-115.
  • 9肖风劲,欧阳华,傅伯杰,牛海山.森林生态系统健康评价指标及其在中国的应用[J].地理学报,2003,58(6):803-809. 被引量:154
  • 10Lu F, Li Z Z. A model of ecosystem health and its application [J].Ecological Modeling,2003,170(1):55-59.

二级参考文献162

共引文献569

同被引文献641

引证文献35

二级引证文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部