期刊文献+

城市突发公共事件交通应急响应级别评价指标体系 被引量:9

Evaluation Index System for Traffic Emergency Response Grading for Urban Emergency
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了有效应对突发事件,有效利用应急处置资源,根据交通应急响应级别评价指标体系建立的原则,在分析突发事件特性的基础上,结合专家意见,从交通响应的紧急程度和交通救援的难易程度2个方面,初拟评价指标体系。用专家经验法分析指标的相关性和完备性,用模糊优先排序法判断指标的重要性,从而对指标体系进行筛选,得到交通应急响应级别综合评价指标体系,并对每一个指标的定义进行了说明,为下一步的交通应急响应级别判定提供了平台。 In order to respond to emergency and use emergency resources effectively, according to the principle of establishment of evaluation index system for traffic emergency response grading; the preliminary evaluation index system was drawn up on the basis of characteristics analysis and expert advices. The preliminary evaluation index system includes urgent degree of traffic response and difficult degree of traffic rescue. The correlation and completeness of the indexes were analyzed by expert experience, the significance of the indexes was judged by fuzzy prioritization method, and the evaluation index system was selected. Thus, a comprehensive evaluation index system of traffic emergency index was defined, which will provide a platform for judgment response grading was established, and each of traffic emergency response grading
作者 何雅琴 李杰
出处 《公路交通科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期116-121,共6页 Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
基金 国家软科学研究计划项目(2010GXS5D237)
关键词 交通工程 突发事件 模糊优先排序法 评价指标 交通应急响应 traffic engineering emergency fuzzy prioritization method evaluation index traffic emergencyresponse
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

共引文献70

同被引文献75

  • 1宋英华.基于熵权模糊法的公众应急能力评价研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(12):183-188. 被引量:16
  • 2刘铁民,刘功智,陈胜.国家生产安全应急救援体系分级响应和救援程序探讨[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(12):5-8. 被引量:53
  • 3马亚丽,王东炜,张爱林.在役桥梁结构健康等级的多级模糊综合评判[J].北京工业大学学报,2005,31(1):36-40. 被引量:19
  • 4国务院.国家突发公共事件总体应急预案[R].2006.
  • 5国务院.国家突发公共事件总体应急预案[S].2006(1).
  • 6谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].3版.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2005.
  • 7THOMAS R D, LU, P Y. The Development of Emergency Response Values [ C ] // 1st Joint Emergency Preparedness and Response/Robotic and Remote Systems Topical Meeting. La Grange Park, Illinois: American Nuclear Society, 2006:424 -430.
  • 8BROWN D F, DUNN W E. Application of a Quantitative Risk Assessment Method to Emergency Response Planning [ J ]. Computers and Operations Research, 2007, 34 (5): 1243 -1265.
  • 9交通运输部.公路交通突发事件应急预案(交公路发[2009]226号)[S].2009.
  • 10Chandran B, Golden B, Wasil E. Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32(9): 2235-2254.

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部