期刊文献+

日菲关系正常化进程中的战争赔偿交涉探析 被引量:2

On Reparation Negotiations in the Process of the Normalization of Relations Between Japan and Philippines
原文传递
导出
摘要 在战后日菲关系正常化过程中,战争赔偿是首先需要解决的难题。以旧金山和会为界,日菲赔偿问题分为两个阶段。和会前,美国掌握着日本赔偿政策的主导权。对于美国起初的拆迁赔偿政策,菲律宾表示支持。但随着冷战的加剧,美国关于日本赔偿政策转向减少甚至放弃赔偿,这遭到菲律宾的反对。出于战略考虑,美国转而提出"劳务赔偿"。和会后,日菲赔偿转入双边轨道。由于菲律宾国内的党派纷争,赔偿问题的解决成为对日和约批准的先决条件。经过漫长交涉,双方最终达成赔偿协定,为两国关系的正常化扫清了障碍。 After World War II , war reparation was the first problem to be solved in the process of the normalization of relations between Japan and Philippines. Bounded by the San Francisco meeting, the issue of reparation is divided into two phases. U.S. held the initiative in the Japanese policy of reparation before the San Francisco meeting. As for the initial policy of demolition's reparation, Philippines expressed support. But with the Cold War intensified, the United States' policy of reparation shift to reduce or even abandon to Japan, which was the opposition of the Philippines. Out of strategic thinking, the United States put forward "labor reparation". After the San Francisco meeting, reparation shift to bilateral orbits in two countries. Due to the Philippines domestic partisan struggle, solution to the issue of reparation became a prerequisite for ratifying the San Francisco peace treaty. After lengthy negotiations, the two sides eventually concluded the reparation agreement for clearing the obstacle to the normalization of relations between Japan and Philippines.
作者 邹志明
出处 《历史教学(下半月)》 CSSCI 2012年第6期59-65,共7页 History Teaching
关键词 赔偿交涉 日本 菲律宾 正常化 Reparation Negotiations, Japan, Philippines, Normalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1[日]有泽广巳等,鲍显铭等译.日本的崛起:昭和经济史[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社.1987.
  • 2Takmshi Ohno, War Reparations and Peace Settlement: Philip- pines-Japan Relations 1945 - 1956 [M].Manila: Solidaridad Pub- lishing House, 1986.
  • 3FRUS[Z].1950, East Asia and the Pacific Vol.VI,1950.
  • 4FRUS[Z]. 1951, Asia and the Pacific(in two parts) Vol. VI, Part 1,1951.
  • 5国际条约集(1950-1952)[M].北京:世界知识出版社,1961:335-336.
  • 6American draft of Jap treaty to be revised[N]. The Manila Times, 1951-6-24.
  • 7Statement of Foreign Secretary Elizalde on the Treaty of Peace with Japan before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, PhilippineSenate, April 4, 1952[Z]. DFA Treaty Series ,Vol II ,No.l, op.cit.
  • 8Major Parties back move to resume rep confabs, but Elizalde stands pat[N]. The Manila Times, 1952-11-15.
  • 9Elizalde Memo., January 13, 1953 [Z].DFA Treaty Series, Vol. 1I, No.l, op.cit..
  • 10Alison acts new US view[N]. The Manila Times,1952-10-4.

共引文献2

同被引文献15

  • 1史勤.从战争赔偿到经济合作:二战后日缅关系的发展与挫折[J].东南亚研究,2022(4):110-128. 被引量:1
  • 2陈金钊.法律渊源:司法视角的定位[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2005(6):1-7. 被引量:66
  • 3FRUS[ DB/OL]. 1949, The Far East and Australasia (in two parts), East Asian-Pacific area, 1949.
  • 4The Far Eastern Commission. A Study in International Co- operation: 1945-1952 [ M ]. Department of State Publica- tion, 1953.
  • 5FRUS[ DB/OL]. 1951, Asia and the Pacific (in two parts) Vol VI, Partl, 1951.
  • 6Roger Dingman. The Diplomacy of Dependency: The Phil- ippines and Peacemaking with Japan, 1955-52[ J ]. Jour- nal of Southeast Asian Studies, 1986(2).
  • 7[日]吉泽清次郎.战后日本同亚洲各国的关系[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1976.
  • 8[日]吉川洋子.日比赔偿外交交涉刃研究:1949-1956[M].东京:劲草书房,1991.
  • 9Alison Acts New US View[ N]. The Manila Times, 1952 - 10 -4.
  • 10Light Dawns on Japanese[ N]. The Manila Times, 1952 - 11 -18.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部