期刊文献+

不同杀菌剂拌种防治小麦全蚀病研究 被引量:14

Control of wheat take-all by seed treatments with different fungicides
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为筛选防治小麦全蚀病的高效安全药剂,对多种杀菌剂在不同浓度下的防效以及对小麦的安全性进行了盆栽试验。结果表明,硅噻菌胺和苯醚甲环唑在推荐浓度下对小麦全蚀病有很好的防治效果,并且对小麦出苗、苗高没有显著影响;咯菌腈的防效与苯醚甲环唑相似,但对小麦出苗有轻微的抑制作用;其他几种杀菌剂对小麦全蚀病也能起到很好的防治效果,但是对小麦的生长有一定的抑制作用。从防治效果、对小麦安全性以及抗药性治理方面综合考虑,将硅噻菌胺、苯醚甲环唑和咯菌腈等交替或混合使用是防治小麦全蚀病比较好的策略。 To screen the effective and safe fungicides for the control of wheat take-all, the control efficacy and safety of the fungicides at different concentrations were investigated in pot experiments. The results indicated that silthiopham and difenoconazole exhibited good control efficiency in controlling wheat take-all, and did not affect the emergence and height of seedlings. The control efficiency of fludioxonil was similar to that of difenoconazole, but slightly inhibited the emergence of seedlings. The others also provided good control efficiency, but significantly inhibited the growth of wheat seedlings. Taken together with the aspects of safety to wheat and resistance management, silthiopham, difenoconazole and fludioxonil were considered suitable for the control of wheat take-all, and should be used alternatively.
出处 《植物保护》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期155-158,175,共5页 Plant Protection
基金 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-3-1-17)
关键词 小麦 全蚀病 化学防治 活性 安全性 wheat take-all chemical control activity safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献73

共引文献84

同被引文献154

引证文献14

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部