LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎临床对比观察

Comparison of LEEP and microwave therapy in the treatment of chronic oervicitis

目的:探讨LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎临床疗效的对比。方法:对2006年2月～2011年3月收治的431例慢性宫颈炎患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用LEEP刀治疗,对照组采用微波治疗。结果:手术中实验组患者出血量多于对照组(P<0.05),而手术时间以及术后出血量两组无明显差异性(P<0.05);实验组患者临床有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者治疗后出现相关并发症的机会明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对慢性宫颈炎尤其是中重度宫颈糜烂采用LEEP刀进行治疗,可有效提高患者临床疗效,降低相关并发症的发生。

Objectives： To compare the clinical efficacy of LEEP and microwave therapy in the treatment of chronic cervici- tis. Methods： Four hundred and thirty - one patients with chronic cervicitis who received treatment in Fusui Maternal and Child care Hospital from February 2006 to March 2011 were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. Pa- tients in the experimental group were treated by LEEP and patients in the control group were treated by microwave therapy. Re- suits： In the surgery process, patients in the experimental group lost more blood than patients in the control group （P 〈 0.05 ）. There was no significant difference in the operation time and postoperative blood loss （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Clinical effective rate of the ex- perimental group is significantly higher （ P 〈 0.05 ） than that of the control group. After the treatment, the experimental group has much lower risk of complications as compared with the control group （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion： In the treatment of chronic cervi- citis, especially severe cervical erosion, application of LEEP can effectively improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the risk of related complications.