期刊文献+

集束化治疗对感染性休克患者预后的影响 被引量:13

The influence of bundle treatment on the prognosis of patients with septic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估集束化治疗在重症医学科实施情况及对感染性休克患者病死率的影响。方法回顾性分析2009年10月~2010年12月我院ICU收治的感染性休克患者48例,根据患者是否完全实施集束化治疗分为两组。将完全实施6 h集束化治疗患者20例作为观察组,将未完全实施集束化治疗患者28例作为对照组,比较两组的病死率和平均住院时间。结果观察组病死率和住院平均时间明显少于对照组(P〈0.05),而APACHEⅡ评分两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论集束化治疗可以较好地降低感染性休克患者的病死率,应提高感染性休克患者集束化治疗的依从性。 Objective To assess the influence of implementation of bundle treatment on the fatality rate of patients with septic shock in ICU department.Methods 48 cases of patients with septic shock in ICU department of our hospital from October 2009 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively and divided into two groups according to implementation of full bundle treatment or not.20 patients who were full implemented 6 h bundle treatment were divided into the observation group,28 cases of patients who were not fully implemented bundle treatment were divided into the control group.The fatality rate and average hospitalization time of the two groups were compared.Results The fatality rate and average hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P 0.05),and APACHE Ⅱ score of the two groups had no significant difference(P 0.05).Conclusion Bundle treatment can reduce the fatality rate of patients with septic shock preferably,the compliance of bundle treatment in patients with septic shock should be improved.
作者 赖军华 陆钰
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2012年第17期53-54,共2页 China Medical Herald
关键词 感染性休克 集束化治疗 预后 Septic shock Bundle treatment Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测及支持指南(草案)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2007,19(3):129-133. 被引量:87
  • 2Brunkhorst FM. Epidemiology,economy and practice? Results of the German study on prevalence by the competence networksepsis [J]. Anasthesiollnt-ensivemed Notfa_ll_med Schemerzther,2006,41 (1) :43-44.
  • 3Dellinger RP,Carlet JM, Masur H,et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for Management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J]. Cirt Care Med, 2004,32 : 858-873.
  • 4陈齐红,郑瑞强,林华,汪华玲,卢年芳,邵俊,於江泉.集束化治疗对感染性休克预后影响的多因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009,19(7):792-794. 被引量:39
  • 5Micek ST,Roubinian N,Heuring T,et al. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2006,34 : 2707-2713.
  • 6Ferrer R,Artigas A,Levy MM,et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain [J]. JAMA, 2008,299 (5) : 2294-2303.

二级参考文献9

  • 1刘大为.严重感染和感染性休克的集束治疗策略[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1178-1180. 被引量:36
  • 2邱海波.应强化和落实严重感染的早期加强治疗策略[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(2):119-120. 被引量:22
  • 3Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving sepsis earn paign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[S]. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30(4):536-555.
  • 4Mitchell M, Levy MD, Peter J, et al. Sepsis change bundles : converting guidelines into meaningful change in behavior and clinical outcome[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32 (11):S595- S597.
  • 5Bryant N,Stephen W,Corbett MD,et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(4) :1-8.
  • 6Fang G,Teresa M,Darren F,et al. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study[J]. Crit Care,2006,9(6) :764-770.
  • 7Brunkhorst FM. Epidemiology,economy and practice-results of the German study on prevalence by the competence net work sepsis [J].Anasthesiol Intensivemed Notfall Med Schemerzther, 2006,41(1) :43-44.
  • 8Scott T,Roubinian N,Heuring T,et al. Before after study of a standardized hospital order set for the managemeng of septic shock[J].Crit Care Med,2006,34(23) :2707-2713.
  • 9刘刚,江宇,卢中秋,邱俏檬,李景荣,吴斌.感染性休克死亡率和危险因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(10):1229-1231. 被引量:28

共引文献124

同被引文献107

引证文献13

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部