期刊文献+

食管癌不同术式术后长期生活质量实验研究 被引量:4

A Study of Longterm Quality of Life after Different Surgical Methods for Esophageal Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨食管癌传统开胸手术中不同术式对术后长期生活质量(QOL)影响。方法:回顾性调查2010年4月1日至2011年4月1日在我科例行传统开胸手术颈部吻合和胸内吻合的160食管癌患者,将其分为两组,A组:颈部吻合手术;B组:胸内吻合手术。采用生活质量测定量表核心量表(QLQ-C30),对其术前和术后3,6和12个月的QLQ-C30得分与参考值进行比较。结果:术后情绪功能,体力功能显着下降;症状方面,术后呼吸困难,疼痛明显加重;术后第3个月疲乏及经济困难明显加重;术后第12个月起,经济困难状况好转,较术前无明显差异;术后颈部吻合手术组较胸内吻合手术组在体力功能、角色功能、情绪功能及总体状况显著的降低;症状方面,颈部吻合手术组较胸内吻合手术组,术后疲乏显著升高,呼吸困难术后显著升高直至术后第12个月才基本恢复,无统计学差异。结论:术后生活质量与术前比较,颈部吻合对患者生活质量影响明显。比较两种方法,颈部吻合患者较胸内吻合患者术后长期生活质量下降明显。 Objective: To investigate the difference of long-term quality of life(QOL) of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer,two surgical methods were assessed in this prospective study.Methods: The quality of life questionnaire,EORTC QLQ-C30 Chinese version,was used to assess the patient’s quality of life.All the 160 patients from April 1,2010 to April 1,2011 in our department treated for esophagectomy were collected in this study.The QLQ-C30 scores of preoperative and postoperative 3,6 and 12 months were compared with each other.Results: Compared with the preoperative and postoperative quality of life,we found that emo-tional function and physical function decreased significantly,dyspnea and pain were aggravated significantly,and fatigue and financial difficulties significantly increased in postoperative 3 months.Financial difficulties was restored at 12 months postoperative.Physical function,role function,emotional function and overall condition decreased significantly.That fatigue postoperative,and dyspnea 3,6 months postoperative was increased significantly in the pneumonectomy group.Conclusion: The preoperative and postoperative quality of life compared to removal of all non-significant impact on patients quality of life.Cervical esophageal anastomosis decreased the long-term quality of life significantly than that of the intrathoracic esophageal anastomosis.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2012年第13期2499-2502,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 食管癌 食管切除术 生活质量 Esophageal cancer Intrathoracic esophageal anastomosis Cervical esophageal anastomosis Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sun X, Chen W, Chen Z, Wen D, Zhao D, He Y. Population-based case-control study on risk factors for esophageal cancer in five high-risk areas in China [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2011, 11 (6): 1631-1636.
  • 2Low DE. Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(5):719-729.
  • 3Rutegard M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, et al. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesop- hageal cancer resection[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(5):592-601.
  • 4Maringwa JT, Quinten C, King M, et al. Minimal important differ- ences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2010, 19(11): 1753-1760.
  • 5Schulte T, Schniewind B, Dohrmann P, et al. The extent of lung parenchyma resection significantly impacts long-term quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Chest, 2009, 135 (2): 322-329.
  • 6Balduyck B, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, et al. Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients[J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 56(3):423-431.
  • 7Olavarrieta JR, Coronel P. Expectations and patient satisfaction related to the use of thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treating recurrence of spontaneous primary pneumothorax [J]. J Bras Pneumol, 2009,35(2): 122-128.
  • 8Rowen D, Brazier J, Young T, et al. Deriving a preference-based measure for cancer using the EORTC qlq-c30[J]. Value Health, 2011, 14(5):721-731.
  • 9Biere SS, Van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer (Br J Surg 2008, 95:1121-1126)[J]. Br J Surg,2009, 96(1):119; author reply 120.
  • 10Whistance RN, Blazeby JM. Systematic review: quality of life after treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer[J]. Curr Opin Support Pal- liat Care, 2011, 5(1):37-46.

同被引文献51

  • 1王金栋,刘俊峰,王其彰,田子强,张月峰.胃食管吻合术后胃食管反流的研究[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2005,21(3):160-162. 被引量:54
  • 2陈建华,卫功铨,邵令方,高宗人,许金良,陈明耀.食管癌颈部、胸内吻合术疗效对比观察及生活质量评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(2):131-133. 被引量:60
  • 3刘肇瑞,魏文强,黄悦勤,乔友林,吴明,董志伟.“食管癌早诊早治方案”的经济学评价[J].癌症,2006,25(2):200-203. 被引量:18
  • 4Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2):69-90.
  • 5Yacoub WN, Meyers BF. Surgical resection in combination with lung volume reduction surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 22(1):38-43.
  • 6Steinke, K., Sewell, P. E., Dupuy, et al. Pulmonary radiofrequency ablation-an international study survey[J]. Anticancer Res, 2004, 24(1): 339-343.
  • 7Balduyck B, Hendriks J, Lanwers P, et al. Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients[J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 56(3):423-431.
  • 8Nishino M, Jackman DM, Hatabu H, et al. New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy[J]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195(3):W221-228.
  • 9Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010, 61(2):69-90.
  • 10Stoelben E, Huber RM, Muller RP et al. Multimodality therapy for lung cancer[J]. Internist (Berl), 2010, 51:1348-1357.

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部