摘要
确立最高人民法院的司法规则制定权具有充分的正当性:从法治实践来看,法律乃是理性有限的人类的建构之物,因而是恒有缺陷的;从法律规范之要求来看,司法不能拒绝裁判;就国民的期待而言,司法必须伸张正义;从司法的运行机制来看,司法职能的实现必然要求司法机关保持相对的独立性与自主性;从比较法的角度来看,司法规则制定权具有一定的普遍性。
The justification for the Supreme People's Court to exercise the fight to formulating judicial rules is sufficient in the following aspects. From the perspective of practicing ruling of law, law can never be flawless since it is constructed by humans with limited rational. With regards to requirement of legal norms, judiciaries cannot deny judgments. From public point of view, justice must be done. As for judicial operational mechanism, the effectuation of judicial functions requires relative independence and autonomy of judicial departments. From the comparative law perspective, the right to formulating judicial rules is of general nature.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2012年第3期135-141,共7页
Northern Legal Science
基金
广东省哲学社会科学青年项目"广东能动司法的理论与实践研究"(项目编号GD11YFX05)
中国博士后科学基金项目"司法规则制定权研究"(项目编号2011M500039)的研究成果
关键词
司法权
司法规则
司法规则制定权
:judicial power
judicial rules
right to formulating judicial rules