期刊文献+

MR增强扫描与钼钯检查对导管原位癌的诊断价值 被引量:1

Diagnosis value of ductal carcinoma in situ with contrast-enhanced MRI and mammography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较MR增强扫描和钼钯对乳腺导管原位癌的诊断价值。方法收集2010~2011年经手术证实为导管原位癌的33位病人(平均年龄60岁,平均病灶大小15 mm)作为研究对象,在术前常规进行MR增强扫描和钼钯检查。结果在经病理证实为导管原位癌33例病人中,MR增强扫描诊断出29例患导管原位癌,其敏感性是87.9%。其中有4例导管原位癌被诊断为良性。而33例病人中钼钯检查诊断21例患导管原位癌(其中包括没有被MR检出的病人),其敏感性是63.6%,其它12例都是由MR增强扫描诊断出。结论钼钯和MR增强扫描都能检出没有钙化的隐匿性导管原位癌,但是MR增强扫描在诊断伴有钙化的小的病灶时需要经钼钯证实。 Objective: To compare mammography with contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of histopathologically verified subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS).Methods: All patients with verified pure DCIS lesions(no signs of invasion or microinvasion) after surgery were identified between 2005 and 2007.Selection criteria were performed mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI at our institute prior to surgery resulting in a cohort of 33 patients(mean patient age,60 years;mean lesion size,15 mm).Results: Contrast-enhanced MRI enabled identification of DCIS in 29 of 33 patients with histopathologically verified pure DCIS,with an overall sensitivity of 87.9% for this patient cohort.The remaining 4 showed no signs of malignancy by contrast-enhanced MRI.In mammography,21 of the 33 patients revealed suspicious outcome(including all lesions not detected by contrast-enhanced MRI),demonstrating an overall sensitivity of 63.6%.The remaining 12 mammographically occult DCIS lesions were all identified in contrast-enhanced MRI.Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI can diagnose mammographically visible and also occult DCIS lesions without microcalcifications.Only small DCIS foci with microcalcifications can additionally be verified by mammography supposing contrast-enhanced MRI as a diagnostic approach
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第3期193-195,共3页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词 导管原位癌 MR增强扫描 钼钯 ductal carcinoma in situ contrast-enhanced MRI mammography
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammog- raphy [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002,94 : 1546 -1554.
  • 2Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure duetal carcinoma in situ by mammog- raphy and magnetic resonance imaging [ J ]. Breast J, 2005,11 :382-390.
  • 3Orel SG, Mendonca ME, Reynolds C. MR imaging of ductal car- cinoma in situ[J]. Radiology, 1997,202:413-420.
  • 4Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Biding HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study [J]. Lancet, 2007,370:485-491.
  • 5Sittek H, Kessler H, Heuek AF, et al. Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0T MR mammography[ J]. Fortschr Rntgenstr, 1997,167:247-251.
  • 6Shiraishi A, Kurosaki Y, Maehara T, et al. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histoptahologieal association with MR imaging and mammography [ J ]. Magn Reson Medic Science, 2003,4 : 159-163.
  • 7Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, et al. Contrast enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcaleifications on mam- mography:resuhs of a muhieenter trial [ J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2006,186,1723-1732.
  • 8Kaiser WA, Zeifler E. MR imaging of the breast:fast imaging se- quences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations [ J ]. Radiology, 1989,70:681-686.
  • 9Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Tumbull LB, et al. Dynamic contrast en- hanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to tri- ple assessment for the preoperative detection of muhifoeal breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg One, 1999,6:599-603.
  • 10Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumors[J]. Eur Radiol, 2000,10:46- 58.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部