期刊文献+

Ki67在不同分子类型乳腺癌组织中的表达及意义 被引量:13

Significance of Ki67 Expression in Different Molecular Classifications of Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ki67在不同分子类型乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义。方法采用免疫组织化学法,检测368例乳腺癌组织标本中Ki67表达情况,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验分析Ki67在不同分子类型乳腺癌组织中的表达差异;采用Spearman秩相关方法,分析Ki67表达与原发肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移及病理分期等的相关性。结果 Lumina型、Her-2型及三阴型乳腺癌组织中Ki67表达强度无显著性差异(χ2=0.015,P=0.993);Ki67表达强度与Lumina型乳腺癌的原发肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移及病理分期呈正相关性(γs=0.167,P=0.013;γs=0.142,P=0.035;γs=0.165,P=0.014),而与Her-2型及三阴型乳腺癌的以上3个病理因素无显著性相关(P>0.05)。结论在Lumina型、Her-2型及三阴型乳腺癌组织中Ki67表达强度无显著性差异,Ki67表达强度与Lumina型乳腺癌的临床病理因素相关,是Lumina型乳腺癌的不良预后因素。 Objective To investigate the difference of Ki67 expression in three molecular classifications of breast cancer and clinic significance. Methods The Ki67 expression was detected in 368 eases of breast cancer tissue specimen by immuno- histoehemistry(IHC) ,The difference of Ki67 expression was analyzed by Wileoxon rank sum test among three molecular classifi- cations of breast cancer tissues ; its correlation with primary tumor diameter ( PTD), axillary lymph node ( ALN ) metastasis and pathological stage were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Results The difference of Ki67 expression was not significant a- mong the Lumina type, Her-2 type, triple-negative (TN) type breast cancer tissues ( X2 = 0.015, P = 0. 993 ) ;The intensity of Ki67 expression was correlate with PTD ,ALN metastasis and pathological stage in Lumina type breast cancer (γs =0. 167 ,P = 0. 013; γs =0. 142,P=0.035;γs =0. 165,P=0.014) ,while not in Her-2 type and TN type breast cancer. Conclusion The intensity of Ki67 expression was not siglificant among three molecular classifications of breast cancer,while it was related to clinic patholog- ical factors of Lumina type breast cancer significantly and Ki67was a poor prognostic factor of Lumina type breast cancer.
机构地区 粤北人民医院
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2012年第3期247-249,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 乳腺癌 分子类型 KI67蛋白 免疫组织化学 Breast carcinoma Molecular classifications Ki67 protein Immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, et al. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation[J]. Int J Cancer, 1983,31 (1) :13.
  • 2Sorlie T, Perou C M, Tibshirani R, et al. C, ene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasseswith clinical implications [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001,98(19) :10869.
  • 3Cheang M C, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype[J]. C/in Cancer Res, 2008,14 (5) : 1368.
  • 4Carey L A, Dees E C, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes[J]. Clin Cancer Res ,2007,13 ( 8 ) :2329.
  • 5Banerjee S, Reis-Filho J S, Ashley S, et al. Basal-like breast carcinomas :clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Pathol,2006,59(7) :729.
  • 6Rakha E A, E1-Sayed M E, Green A R, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2007, 109 ( 1 ) :25.
  • 7De M, Pa H. The location of pKi67 in the outer dense fibril- lary compartment of the nucleolus points to a role in ribo- some biogenesis during the cell division cycle[J]. J Pathol, 2000,190(5) :537.
  • 8邓秀娟,吴海根.Ki67、PTEN在卵巢浆液性肿瘤中的表达及临床意义[J].实用癌症杂志,2011,26(4):365-367. 被引量:15
  • 9P J, T K, L J. Ki67 immunohistochemistry : a valuable marker in prognostication but with a risk of misclassification:prolif- eration subgroups formed based on Ki67 immunoreactivity and standardized mitotic index[J]. Histopatholog,2006,48 : 674.
  • 10Aleskandarany M A, Green A R, Benhasouna A A, et al. Prognostic value of proliferation assay in the luminal, HER2 positive and triple negative biological classes of breast cane- er[J]. Breast Cancer Res,2012,14( 1 ) :R3.

二级参考文献15

  • 1邵汇琳,沈丹华,薛卫成,李艺,虞有智.卵巢上皮性肿瘤的临床病理特征及其细胞周期素D1和p53蛋白表达的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(4):227-232. 被引量:10
  • 2Tan PH,Bay BH,Yip G,et al.Immunohistochemical detection of ki67in breast cancer correlates with transcriptional regulation of genes related to apoptasis and cell death[J].Mod Pathol,2005,18(3):374-381.
  • 3Nielsen TO,Hsu FD,Jensen K,et al.Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma[J].Clin Cancer Res,2004,10(2):5367-5374.
  • 4Siziopkou KP,Cobleigh M.The basal subtype of breast carcinomas may represent the group of breast tumors that could benefit from EGFR-targeted therapies[J].Breast,2007,16(1):104-107.
  • 5Dent R,Trudeau M,Pritchard KJ,et al.Triple negative breast cancer:clinical features and patterns of recurrence[J].Clin Cancer Res,2007,13(5):4429-4434.
  • 6Sorlie T,Perou CM,Tibshirani R,et al.Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2001,98(6):10869-10874.
  • 7ivasy CA,Karaca G,Nanda R,et al.Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma[J[.Mod Pathol,2006,19(2):264-271.
  • 8Rakha EA,EI-Sayed ME,Green AR,et al.Prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer[J].Cancer,2006,109(1):25-32.
  • 9Haffty BG,Yang Q,Reiss M,et al.Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2006,24(6):5652-:5657.
  • 10Bhataydekar JM,Patel DD,Shah NG,et al.Prognostic significance of immunohisto-chemically localized biomarkers in stage Ⅱ and stageⅢ breast cancer,a multivariate analysis[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2000,7(4):305-311.

共引文献24

同被引文献171

  • 1周宗炎.C-erbB-2、P53、ki67、ER和PR在乳腺癌中的表达及意义[J].贵州医药,2011,35(2):118-120. 被引量:9
  • 2陈燕昌,林舜国,郑宇辉,梁建纲,许春森,韩晖,陈大良.乳腺癌Ki-67抗原和DNA倍体的相关性及临床意义[J].福建医科大学学报,2005,39(1):48-50. 被引量:15
  • 3张斌.老年人乳腺癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2005,15(5):422-425. 被引量:39
  • 4李亚芬.老年人乳腺癌的处理原则[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(2):100-101. 被引量:13
  • 5赵卫红,徐兵河,李青,张频,孙燕.70岁以上老年女性乳腺癌患者的特点和预后分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(5):385-388. 被引量:69
  • 6Calascibetta A, Cabibi D, Rausa L, et al.Difference in Ki67 and thymidylate synthase expression in primary tumour compared with metastatic nodes in breast cancer patients [J] . Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2006, 25 (9111) : 1193-1196.
  • 7Masuda H, Masuda N, Kodama Y, et al.Predictive factors for the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients [J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2011 , 67 (4) : 911-917.
  • 8Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, et al.Breast cancer resp"nse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome [J]. Br J Cancer, 2003, 88 (3) : 406-412.
  • 9Zhao H, Ho PC, Lo YH, et al.Interaction of proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) with c-Abl in cell proliferation and response to DNA damages in breast cancer [J]. PLoS One, 2012,7(1): e29416.
  • 10NCCN乳腺癌专家组.NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南(中国版)[S].北京:NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南(中国版)讨论组,2011.

引证文献13

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部