期刊文献+

并购对价方式选择:公司特征与宏观经济冲击 被引量:15

Choice of Payment Method in Mergers & Acquisitions: the Company Features and Macro Economic Shocks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 并购对价是公司顺利完成并购交易的前提,也是并购整合成功与否的保障。以2006—2009年间的265例并购交易为研究样本,采用Logistic回归方法,将微观公司特征变量与宏观经济冲击变量纳入同一研究框架,重点考察在我国特有的宏观环境下并购对价方式选择决策的驱动因素。研究结果表明:并购公司在选择对价方式时,主要关注公司债务融资能力、目标公司的信息不对称、公司未来投资需求以及经济发展水平和货币政策的影响,较少考虑控制权稀释威胁的影响;股票市场的发展水平与并购对价方式选择不存在显著关系,这意味着"市场择时"理论在中国并购市场上并不适用。 Payment methods in M﹠A are the premise, under which a company could smoothly finish the M﹠A transaction, and it is also the security to guarantee the success of M﹠A integration. Based on 265 M﹠A transactions taking place during 2006 and 2009, and by using logistic regression, this thesis has built a multiple regression model which includes not only com- pany feature variables but also macroeconomic shocks variables into one research framework, to examine the specific determi- nants of payment methods of M﹠A in Chinese M﹠A market. The results of the study show that: when the bidders choose pay- ment method, they pay more attention on the debt financing ability, target company's information asymmetry, the company fu- ture investment opportunities, as well as the influence of the economic development level and monetary policy; Considering less the threat of diluted control, and there is no significant relationship between the extent of stock market development and M﹠A payment method. This means that "market timing" theory is not suitable for Chinese M﹠A market.
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期55-65,共11页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71172120)
关键词 并购对价方式选择 公司特征 宏观经济冲击 企业并购重组 企业控制权分离 公司并购交易 M﹠A consideration method option company features terprise separation of control power M﹠A bargainc shock enterprise M&A regrouping en-
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Netter J, Stegemoller M, Wintoki M B. Implications of data screens on merger and acquisition analysis: a large sample study of mergers and acquisitions from 1992 to 2009 [ J ]. Review of Financial Studies ,2011,24 (7) :2316 -2357.
  • 2方军雄.政府干预、所有权性质与企业并购[J].管理世界,2008,24(9):118-123. 被引量:247
  • 3潘红波,夏新平,余明桂.政府干预、政治关联与地方国有企业并购[J].经济研究,2008,43(4):41-52. 被引量:620
  • 4Hansen R. A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions [ J]. Journal of Business, 1987,60 (1) :75 -95.
  • 5Stulz R. Managerial control of voting rights : financing policies and the market for corporate control[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988,20 (2) :25 - 54.
  • 6Martin K. The method of payment in corporate acquisitions, investment opportunities, and managerial ownership [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1996,51 (2) : 1227 - 1246.
  • 7Martynova M, Renneboog L. What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers : cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment ? [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2009,15 (2) :290 - 315.
  • 8苏文兵,李心合,李运.公司控制权、信息不对称与并购支付方式[J].财经论丛,2009(5):67-73. 被引量:29
  • 9李善民,陈涛.并购支付方式选择的影响因素研究[c].北京:第四届中国管理学年会一金融分会场论文集,2009:405-412.
  • 10Zhang hui, Ping shun. What really determines the payment methods in M&A deals [ EB/OL ]. [ 2001 - 01 - 03 ]. http ://ssrn. com/abstract = 284770.

二级参考文献101

共引文献895

引证文献15

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部