期刊文献+

中国上市公司费用粘性行为的经验证据——基于上市公司实质控制人性质不同的视角 被引量:61

An Empirical Study on the Cost Stickiness Behavior from Chinese Listed Companies: Base on Difference Nature of Actual Controller
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有研究发现,成本费用随业务量增减变动的变化具有不对称性,费用因业务量增加而上升的速度要高于业务量减少时费用降低的速度。本文将我国沪深两市A股上市公司按照实质控制人性质的不同,分为国有上市公司和非国有上市公司,分别对其2004年—2010年的财务数据检验后发现:(1)我国国有上市公司和非国有上市公司的销管费用均存在费用粘性行为;(2)国有上市公司的费用粘性程度要高于非国有上市公司;(3)金融危机后我国上市公司费用粘性程度有所提高,非国有上市公司提高幅度较大;(4)资本密集度对于我国上市公司费用粘性的增强起到一定作用,相比较而言,国有上市公司受其影响较强烈。 Existing studies on cost behavior indicate that the proportion of cost change with volume increases and decreases is asymmetric. The speed of cost increases with volume is faster than the speed of cost decreases. In this study, we divide Chi- nese listed companies based on difference nature of actual controller into two classifications, state-owned listed companies and non state-owned listed companies. By analyzing the accounting data during 2004 to 2010 of these listed companies respective- ly, we find : ( 1 ) SG﹠A costs have a feature of stickiness with changes in volume in both types of listed companies ; (2) the speed of state-owned listed companies' SG﹠A increase is faster than non state-owned listed companies'; (3) after the financial crisis, the cost stickiness' degree of Chinese listed companies improves, while the situation of non state-owned listed companies' is more serious ; (4) cost stickiness of listed companies in China is enhanced by capital-intensive, and state-owned companies are affected more strongly.
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期79-86,共8页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 2012年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(12YJA630112)
关键词 企业费用粘性 实质控制人 金融危机 国有上市公司 非国有上市公司 成本性态 enterprise cost stickiness actual controller financial crisis state-owned listed companies non-state-owned lis-ted companies cost nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Anderson M C, Banker R D, Janakiraman S N. Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky" .9 [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41 ( 1 ) :47 -63.
  • 2孙铮,刘浩.中国上市公司费用“粘性”行为研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):26-34. 被引量:489
  • 3曹晓雪,于长春,周泽将.费用“粘性”研究:来自中央企业的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2009(1):40-46. 被引量:57
  • 4Horngren C T,George Foster,Datar S M. A managerial emphasis[ M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1997:28—29.
  • 5Weidenmier M L, Subramaniam C. Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs [ R ]. Working Paper. Texas Christian University,2003.
  • 6Balakrishnan R,Petersen M J,Soderstrom N S. Does capacity utilization affect the "stickness" of cost[J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2004,19 ( 3 ) :283 - 299.
  • 7Calleja K, Steliaro M,Thomas D C. A note on cost stickiness: some international comparisons[ J ]. Management Accounting Research,2006,17 : 127 - 140.
  • 8Balakrishnan R, Gruca T S. Cost stickiness and core competency : a note [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2008,25 (4) :993 - 1006.
  • 9Clara Xiaoling Chen, Hal Lu ,Theodore Sougiannis. Managerial empire building, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs [ R ]. AAA 2008 Financial Accounting and Reporting Section (FARS) Paper, (CAAA) 2008 Annual Conference Paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Toronto, 2008.
  • 10Dierynck B, Renders A. Earnings management incentives and the asymmetric behavior of labor costs [ R]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,2009.

二级参考文献46

共引文献581

同被引文献548

引证文献61

二级引证文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部