期刊文献+

考虑混凝土结构实际滞回性能的R-μ-T规律分析 被引量:3

Studies onR-μ-Tlaw of reinforced concrete structures with practical hysteretic model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 单自由度体系R-μ-T规律是基于性能的抗震设计理论中的基本规律之一。以往大多研究者认为滞回模型对R-μ-T规律没有影响,但这些研究中采用的滞回模型都是理想化模型,并没有考虑实际结构的滞回性能。为了弥补R-μ-T规律研究中的这个缺陷,分别采用考虑刚度退化的两折线理想模型和考虑钢筋混凝土结构实际滞回性能的三折线模型,利用非弹性时程分析手段,计算周期从0.05-10s的单自由度体系的R-μ-T联系,分析了2种不同滞回模型对R-μ-T戒律的影响。结果表明:当采用更贴近混凝土结构实际力学特征的三折线滞回模型时,在尺相同的条件下,结构的延性需求μ有偏小的趋势;当结构自振周期较长时,采用传统的“等位移原理”是偏保守的。 R-μ-T relationship of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system is one of the principal laws in performance-based anti-seismic design. In most of previous studies, it was generally concluded that the hysteretic model used in analysis has no effect on the R-μ-T law. However, the hysteretic model used in these studies is idealized and does not take into account the actual hysteretic behaviors of reinforced concrete structures. To make up this deficiency in previous studies, a series of inelastic time history analyses are conducted with two different hysteretic models, i.e., the idealized degrading bilinear model and the Takeda degrading Iri-linear model. Then the R-μ-T relationships of different SDOF systems with the fundamental period from 0.05 s to 10 s are explored, and the effects of hysteretic models on the R-μ-T relationship are investigated. The results indicated that compared with the results based on idealized degrading bilinear model, the ductility demands (μ) of SDOF systems decrease to some extent when a more practical Takeda hysteretic model is adopted, and the traditional "equal displacement rule" may be conservative for the structures with a long fundamental period.
出处 《中国科技论文》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第5期347-352,共6页 China Sciencepaper
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师基金资助项目(200806111017) 重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(2008BB0188)
关键词 钢筋混凝土结构 R-μ-T规律 滞回模型 非弹性动力反应分析 reinforced concrete structures R-μ-Trelationship hystcretic models inelastic dynamic response analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1BerteroVV. Performance-based seismicengineering:acriticalreviewof proposed guidelines[A].Bled/Slovenia,1997.24-27.
  • 2Newmark N M,Hall WJ. EarthquakeSpectra and Design[M].Oakland,California,USA:EERI Monograph Series,Earthquake Engineering ResearchInstitute,1982.
  • 3Nassar A A,Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems Report No.95[R].California:Blume Earthquake Engineering Center,Stanford University,Stanford,California,1991.12-45.
  • 4Miranda E,Bertero V V. Evaluation of strength reduction factor for earthquake-resistancedesign[J].EarthqSpectra,1994,(02):357-379.
  • 5Vidic T,Fajfar P,Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra:strength and displacement[J].Earthq Eng Struct Dynam,1994,(03):507-521.
  • 6BorziB,ElnashaiAS. Refined force reduction factorsforseismicdesign[J].JEngStruct,2000,(10):1244-1260.
  • 7卓卫东,范立础.结构抗震设计中的强度折减系数研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(1):84-88. 被引量:63
  • 8吕西林,周定松.考虑场地类别与设计分组的延性需求谱和弹塑性位移反应谱[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(1):39-48. 被引量:85
  • 9白绍良,李刚强,李英民,韦锋.从R-μ-T关系研究成果看我国钢筋混凝土结构的抗震措施[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(5):144-151. 被引量:23
  • 10Santa-Ana P R,Miranda E. Strength reduction factors for multi-degree-of-freedom systems[A].IAEE,Auckland.NewZealand,2000.1446.

二级参考文献70

  • 1徐培福,戴国莹.超限高层建筑结构基于性能抗震设计的研究[J].土木工程学报,2005,38(1):1-10. 被引量:223
  • 2时振梁,陈汉尧.基岩地震反应谱随震级、距离的变化特征[J].地震工程与工程振动,1995,15(1):14-17. 被引量:5
  • 3.GBJ50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].中国建筑工业出版社,2001..
  • 4GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 5GB J11-87 铁路工程抗震设计规范,1989年
  • 6JTJ 004-80 公路工程抗震设计规范,1989年
  • 7耿淑伟,陶夏新,王国新.2002.对抗震设计规范中地震作用规定的三点修改建议[G]//王亚勇主编.现代地震工程进展.南京:东南大学出版社.919-925.
  • 8国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中华人民共和国建设部.2001.建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2001)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.15-17.
  • 9Abrahamson N A,Silva W J.1997.Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquake[J].Seism Res Lett,68(1:94-127.
  • 10Ambraseys N N,Simpson K A,Bommer J J.1996.Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe[J].Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn,25(4):371-400.

共引文献267

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部