从接受者角度分析中国古代分体文学史的优势——兼与历时性通史比较

An Analysis of the Advantage of Ancient Chinese Stylistic Literature from the Perspective of the Reader——Diachronic Comparison of General History

中国古代文学史中,以朝代次序编写的历时性通史与从文体角度书写的分体文学史是最常见的形式。相对目前流行的历时性通史,分体文学史内容集中,更接近回归文学本位,使专业学习者更易于把握文学的"文学性",也更符合中国文化传统,并且在以社会文化视角解读文本方面具有更大优势。

In the history of ancient Chinese literature, it is common for diachronic general history and stylistic literature to be written in dynastic order. Compared with the current prevalence of diachronic history, stylistic literature with relatively fewer items is closer to the regression literature standard, so that it is easier to for learners to grasp the ＂literary nature＂ of literature and understand the texts in line with the traditional Chinese culture.