期刊文献+

《橘颂》为屈原早期作品的一条新证据

A New Proof of Creation Time of Ode to Oranges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于《橘颂》的作年,自王逸以降,洪兴祖、朱熹等楚辞名家,力主晚期说,由于他们在汉、宋楚辞接受史上具有标志性地位,所以晚期说影响深远。持中期说者也不乏其人。现当代楚辞学界的主流看法是早期说。本文根据《橘颂》文本中屡用否定副词的现象,从心理学角度为早期说提供一条新证据。 Wang Yi,Hong Xingzu,Zhu Xi and other researchers of Songs of Chu claimed that Ode to Oranges was created in the late years of Qu Yuan.Because those scholars played important roles in helping people accepting Songs of Chu in Han and Song Dynasties,their 'late period' statement had a profound impact.There were also some scholars who thought that Ode to Oranges belonged to Qu Yuan's mid-term works.In contemporary educational circles for Songs of Chu,more people insisted that Ode to Oranges was written in the early years of Qu Yuan,mainly based on internal evidence and few external proofs.The paper provides a new evidence for 'early period' statement from the perspective of psychology by studying the frequent use of negative adverbs in Ode to Oranges.
作者 周红波
出处 《三峡论坛》 2012年第3期42-44,147-148,共3页 China Three Gorges Tribune
关键词 《橘颂》 屈原 早期 Ode to Oranges Qu Yuan early period
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M]北京:中华书局,1983120.
  • 2朱熹.楚辞集注[M]北京:中华书局,200172.
  • 3陈学文.《橘颂》当为屈原晚年所作[J].文史知识,2001(3):111-119. 被引量:2
  • 4姜亮夫.名家品诗坊·楚辞[M]上海:上海辞书出版社,200492.
  • 5郭沫若.屈原研究[M]上海:新文艺出版社,195137.
  • 6谭介甫.屈赋新编[M]北京:中华书局,197859.
  • 7袁行霈.中国文学史[M]北京:高等教育出版社,2005119.
  • 8赵逵夫.屈原与他的时代[M]北京:人民文学出版社,1996100.
  • 9詹姆斯·O·卢格;陈德民.人生发展心理学[M]上海:学林出版社,1996651670646645.
  • 10林庚.中国文学简史[M]北京:清华大学出版社,200772.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部