摘要
1956年10月,以色列在美国总统大选前8天,不顾艾森豪威尔政府预先劝诫,在英、法两国幕后策划下,对埃及发动先发制人的打击。艾森豪威尔总统为此采取一系列行动,如诉诸联合国、启动对以经济制裁、甚至威胁驱逐其出联合国,最终实现被他称之为"侵略者"的三方无条件停火撤退。艾森豪威尔成功的范例给2012年面临同样难题的奥巴马提供了一些历史经验:美国的外交不能被一个小盟国所捆绑,即便他们曾是美国的"铁杆"朋友。美国只有坚持公正、理性与原则,且在冲突中支持受害者,才能最大程度上维护美国的利益与形象,并最终使美国成为中东最具有决定性的外部力量。
Regardless of the exhortation of the Eisenhower Administration in advance, Israel formulated a secret plan with Britain and France, and took a pre- emptive military strike on Egypt in October 1956, just eight days before U. S. presidential election. In order to stop Israel, Britain and France, President Ei- senhower made a range of efforts, which included presenting a cease - fire resolution to the UN against Israel, proposing the U. S. Congress to agree with launching eco- nomic sanctions, and even threatening to have Israel expelled from the United Na- tions. All these strong pressures finally forced the three parties, which he called ag- gressors, to cease fire and retreat unconditionally. The experience of Eisenhower' s wise response to the Suez Crisis might provide historical lessons for President Obama: U. S. foreign policy could not be bound by a small country' s plan, even though this country is a friend of the United States. America should pursue the just, rational stance of obeying the rules and supporting the victims in a conflict. Through these ways, the state interests and international prestige of the United States could be maintained to a great extent. Since then, America gradually became the most in- fluential force in the Middle East.
出处
《西亚非洲》
北大核心
2012年第3期116-127,共12页
West Asia and Africa
关键词
美以关系
苏伊士运河危机
艾森豪威尔
奥巴马
U.S. -Israel Relations
The Suez Crisis
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Barack H. Obama