期刊文献+

专利审查行为对技术创新的影响机理研究 被引量:28

Study on the impact mechanism of the patent examination behavior on technological innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了缓解越来越严峻的审查压力,各主要专利局近年来频繁对专利系统从审查行为的角度进行改革。本文对专利审查行为影响技术创新的机理从审查质量、审查周期和费用三个维度进行了系统分析,研究认为专利审查的犯错率过高、专利审查的周期过长、专利审查的费用标准过低,对技术创新可能产生阻碍效应。同时,专利审查系统内部存在审查质量与审查周期的相互影响关系,而在专利审查系统外部也存在专利审查行为与技术创新的循环影响关系。为此,本文提出我国专利局在缓解审查积压时,为了在保持审查系统内部平衡的基础上改善专利审查行为与技术创新间循环回路的运行效应,应尽快提高我国专利审查费用的标准和建立快速审查请求制度。 In order to alleviate the increasingly severe examination pressure in recent years, all major patent offices have frequently im- plemented reforms from the perspective of patent examining behavior. The systematic analysis in this paper has been conducted in un- derstanding the mechanism of the patent examination impacts upon technological innovation, This mechanism is built from the following three dimensions: improperly high error rate, excessively long examination period and unnecessarily low patent examination fees. These phenomena will hinder technological innovation. Meanwhile, mutual impacts of examination quality and examination period in the inter- nal patent - auditing institution and escalating interrelationships between patent examination and technological innovation also exist out- side official patent examination system. It is concluded that the standard of patent examination fees and establish the quickly examina- tion of request system should formulated so as to relax the backlog of patent applications and improve the effectiveness of enhancing technological innovation through patent examining behavior while maintaining the internal patent examination balance.
作者 文家春
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期848-855,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71003037) 中国博士后科学基金(20100480895)
关键词 专利审查质量 专利审查周期 专利审查费用 技术创新 patent examination quality patent examination period patent examination fees technology innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents [ M ]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.56.
  • 2Burke P F, Reitzig M. Measuring patent assessmentquality: analyzing the degree and kind of (In) consis- tency in patent offices" decision making [ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9) : 1404 - 1430.
  • 3Combeau J. Patent Quality [ EB/OL]. Available at www. ficpi, org/library/07 AmsterdamColloqu/5 - Combeau_revised. pdf. 2011 - 06 - 21.
  • 4Paul H J, Alfons, P, Elizabeth W. Misclassification in patent offices [ J]. Intellectual Property Research Insti- tute of Australia Working Paper, 2008, No. 02/08.
  • 5Lemley M A. Rational ignorance at the patent Office [J]. Northeastern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4) :1495 - 1523.
  • 6Palangkaraya A, Jensen P H,Webster E. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes [ R ]. Intel- lectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper, 2005, No. 09/05.
  • 7Quillen Jr, C D,Webster O H. Continuing patent appli- cations and performance of the U.S. patent office [ J ]. The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 2001, 11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
  • 8Jensen P H,Webster E M. Factors affecting the power of patent rights [ R]. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Re- search Institute of Australia (IPRIA) , Working Paper, 2004, No. 31/04.
  • 9Gallini N T. The economics of patents: lessons from re- cent U. S. Patent Reform [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 ( 2 ) : 131 - 154.
  • 10Gaetan R, Bruno P. On the price elasticity of demand for patents [ J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statis- tics, 2011, 4 May.

同被引文献314

引证文献28

二级引证文献207

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部