期刊文献+

上尿路结石患者体质指数对24h尿成分的影响 被引量:1

Impact o f body mass index on 24-hour urine composition in patients with upper urinary tract calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨上尿路结石患者体质指数(body mass index,BMI)对24 h尿成分及相关血生化指标的影响。方法 :对119例上尿路结石患者进行代谢评估,根据BMI将其分为3组,正常组(18.5≤BMI<24.0,n=37)、超重组(24≤BMI<27,n=52)、肥胖组(27≤BMI,n=30),生化分析系统检测24 h尿钠、钾、钙、磷、尿酸、血钠、血钾、血钙、血磷、血尿酸、尿pH及尿比重等指标,比较组间各指标及代谢异常率的差异性。结果:男性中肥胖、超重组的24 h尿钠、钙、磷、尿酸及血尿酸均明显高于正常组(P<0.05);肥胖组尿pH明显低于超重组和正常组(P<0.05);超重组血磷高于正常组(P<0.05)。女性中肥胖组和超重组24 h尿钙、尿酸均明显高于正常组(P<0.05);肥胖组和超重组尿pH均明显低于正常组(P<0.05);肥胖组24 h尿钠高于正常组(P<0.05)。肥胖组高钠尿症、高钙尿症、高尿酸尿症及合并两种或两种以上代谢异常率明显高于正常组(P<0.05),超重组高钠尿症、高钙尿症及合并两种或两种以上代谢异常率明显高于正常组(P<0.05),而肥胖组的高钙尿症及合并两种或两种以上代谢异常率明显高于超重组(P<0.05)。结论:肥胖及超重对24 h尿成分及相关血生化、尿pH有一定影响,且存在性别差异,对结石病患者尤其是伴肥胖或超重者进行代谢评价是必要的。 Objective:To evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on 24-hour urine compositions and blood biochemistries in Patients with upper urinary tract calculi. Methods:A total of 119 of patients with upper urinary tract calculi were evaluated ,and were classified as normal weight (18.5≤BMI〈24.0,n = 37),overweight (24≤BMI〈27,n = 52),or obese (27≤BMI,n = 30). The 24- hour urine sodium,potassium,calcium,phosphate,uric acid, serum sodium,potassium,calcium,phosphate,uric acid,and urine pH, and urine specific gravity were determined by biochemistry analyzer and were compared among the three groups. The proportion of metabolic disturbances was also compared among the three groups. Results:In male patients with stones,24-hour urine sodium, calcium, phosphate, uric acid and serum uric acid in obese and overweight groups were both significantly higher than those in normal group (P 〈 0.05). Urine pH in the obese group was significantly lower than that in overweight and normal groups (P 〈 0.05). Serum phosphate level in the overweight group was significantly higher than that in the normal group (P 〈 0.05). In female patients with stones, 24-hour urine calcium,uric acid in the obese and overweight groups were both significantly higher than those in the normal group (P 〈 0.05). Urine pH in the obese and overweight groups were significantly lower than those in normal group(P 〈 0.05). Urine sodium in the obese group was significantly higher than that in normal group (P 〈 0.05). The proportion of hypersodiuria, hypercalciuria,hyperuricosuria and hyperphosphatemia and combined two or more metabolic disturbances in the obese group were significantly higher than those in normal group (P 〈 0.05). The proportion of hypersodiuria,hypercalciuria and combined two or more metabolic disturbances in the overweight group were significantly higher than those in the normal group(P 〈 0.05). The proportion of hypersodiuria and combined two or more metabolic disturbances in obese group were significantly higher than those in overweight group(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: Obesity and overweight play a role in changes in 24-hour compositions,associated blood bio- chemistries and urine pH, and there is gender difference. A metabolic evaluation is necessary for stone patients,especially for obese and overweight ones, in treating and preventing urinary stones.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期695-699,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基金 南京医科大学面上基金(09NJMMUM117)
关键词 尿路结石 24h尿成分 体质指数 urinary stone 24-bour urine composition body mass index
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Stamatelou KK,Francis ME,Jones CA, et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994 [J]. Kidney Int,2003,63 (5): 1817- 1823.
  • 2Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF, et al. Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers[J]. Urology, 2000,55 (6) : 825-830.
  • 3Taylor EN, Curhan GC. Body size and 24-hour urine com- position[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2006,48(6):905-915.
  • 4Taylor EN, Stampfer M J, Cnrhan GC. Obeisity,weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones [ J ]. JAMA, 2005,293 (4) :455-462.
  • 5Choo V. WHO reassesses appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations[J ]. Lancet, 2002,360(9328) : 235.
  • 6张德元.尿石症的诊断[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:61-62.
  • 7Park KJ,Jeon SS,Han DH,et al. Clinical and metabolic evaluation of Korean patients with urolithiasis[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest,2011,71 (6) :481-485.
  • 8Jeong JY, Doo SW, Yang WJ, et al. Differences in urinary stone composition according to body habitus [J]. Korean J Urol,2011,52(9) :622-625.
  • 9Nowfar S,Palazzi-Churas K,Chang DC,et al. The rela- tionship of obesity and gender prevalence changes in U- nited States inpatient nephrolithiasis [J]. Urology,2011, 78(5) : 1029-1033.
  • 10Negri AL,Spivacow FR,Del Valle EE,et al. Role of overweight and obesity on the urinary excretion of promoters and inhibitiors of stone formation in stone formers[J]. Urol Res, 2008,36(6) : 303-307.

同被引文献13

  • 1Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D' A Honey R J, et al. Evalu- ating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to- stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotrispsy of renal and ureteric calculi[J]. Urol Res, 2010,38 (4) :307-313.
  • 2Pareek G,Armenakas NA,Panagopoulos G,et al. Extra- corporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units[J].Urology,2005,65 (1):33-36.
  • 3Yoshida S,Hayashi T,Ikeda J,et al. Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncon- trast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. Urology, 2006,68 ( 1 ) : 33-37.
  • 4Pathaka S,Lavina V,Vijayb R,et al. Radiological deter- mination of stone density and skin-to-stone distance - Can it predict the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? [Jl. Bri J Med Surg Urol, 2009,2(1) : 180-184.
  • 5Verze P,Imbimbo C. Extracorporeal shoekwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with sin- gle, distal ureteric stones :a prospective randomized study[J]. BJU Int,2010,106(11):1748-1752.
  • 6Choi JW, Song PH, Kim HT. Predictive factors of the out- come of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones[J]. Korean J Urol,2012,53(6) :424-430.
  • 7Jacobs BL,Smadone MC,Smaldone AM,et al. Effect of skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy success[J]. J Endourol, 2008,22 ( 10): 1623-1625.
  • 8Park BH,Choi H,Kim JB,et al. Analyzing the effect of distance from skin to stone by computed tomography scan on the extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rate of renal stones[J]. Korean J Urol,2012,53(1):40-43.
  • 9Abdelaziz H, Elabiad Y, Aderrouj I, et al. The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predieting extra- corporeal shockwave efficiency: Results in African ethnic group[J]. Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8(7-8):567-569.
  • 10郭宏伟,刘历,李琦,俞腾先,杨艺,李博云,贾世方,刘杰.16层螺旋CT曲面重建在输尿管中下段结石诊断中的临床应用价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(13):1463-1465. 被引量:5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部