摘要
2011年10月30日发布的《民事诉讼法修正案(草案)》第16条至第18条对现有的保全制度进行了修改,将行为保全制度纳入其中,规定了行为保全的类型、条件、启动方式、担保、裁定、解除等内容。此次修改具有显著的进步意义,但修正案构建的行为保全制度仍有空白与不足,建议在此次修正案的基础上,将启动方式限制于依照申请、起诉时间保持为15天、完善对被申请人的救济措施以及明确国家赔偿责任。
The Article 16 to 18 in the Civil Procedure Law Amendment（Draft） , issued on October 30,2011, has modified the existing preservation system. It has added the act preservation system, including the type, conditions, startup mode, guarantee, adjudication, removal and so on. From the vertical perspective, the reversion has marked advanced significance. However, compared with other coun- try＇s relative rules, there are still many shortcomings. On the basis of the amendment, it might be better to limit the start way to applica- tion, to keep prosecution time of 15 days, to improve relief measures for the respondent and to clear national ability.
出处
《新余学院学报》
2012年第3期18-21,共4页
Journal of Xinyu University
关键词
行为保全
修正案
正当性
评析
建议
Act Preservation
Amendment
legitimacy
analysis
suggestion
