期刊文献+

教师专业发展能动性量表的研制 被引量:17

Research on Reliability and Validity of Professional Development Agency Scale for Teachers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在文献分析的基础上,文章界定了教师专业发展能动性的概念,并通过教师访谈和理论分析进行理论建构,据此编制教师专业发展能动性量表,对249名教师有效被试进行调查。经过探索性和验证性因素分析以及信效度检验,结果表明:教师专业发展能动性量表包括专业发展个人能动性和专业发展环境能动性两个维度。教师专业发展能动性量表具有良好的信效度,可用于测量教师的专业发展能动性。 Based on theoretical construction of teachers' professional development agency, professional de- velopment agency scale for teaehers was developed. The scale contains two dimensions, which are personal agency and context agency. Fourteen excellent teachers were interviewed and 249 teachers were involved in the scale assessment. The results from confirmatory factor analyses and Cronbaeh's Alpha test showed the 2 factors model of the scale strongly supported, and the reliability and validity of the scale were well accepted. It could be used to test teachers' professional development agency.
作者 张娜
出处 《心理研究》 2012年第3期78-84,共7页 Psychological Research
关键词 教师专业发展 能动性 量表研制 professional development agency scale development
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1叶澜.改善发展“生境”提升教师自觉[N].中国教育报,2007-9-15(03).
  • 2黄祯K.突同与自强.华中师范大学博士论文,2008.
  • 3白益民.教师的自我更新:背景、机制与建议[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2002,20(4):28-38. 被引量:115
  • 4戴双翔,姜勇.论教师的自由[J].教育发展研究,2008,28(1):7-10. 被引量:13
  • 5Wagner B D. Motivation and professional growth in early childhood teachers. Doctoral Dissertation, Univer- sity of Rochester, NY. 2006.
  • 6Bandura A. Human agency: The rhetoric and the re- ality. American Psychologist, 1991, 46: 157-162.
  • 7Bandura A. Reconstrual of 'free will' from the agenticperspective of social cognitive theory. Are We Free? Psychology and Free Will, 2008:86-127.
  • 8Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control New York: WH Freeman and Company. 1997.
  • 9高申春.自我效能理论评述[J].心理发展与教育,2000,16(1):60-64. 被引量:332
  • 10Ashton P T, Buhr D, Crocker L. Teachers' sense of efficacy: A self- or noml-referenced construct? Flori- da Journal of Educational Research, 1984, 26:29-41.

二级参考文献19

  • 1[1]American Federation of Teachers (June2001). A Report of the Aft Task Force on Union-Sponsored Professional Development.
  • 2[2]T. Barone, D. C. Berliner, J. Blanchard, U. Casanova & T. McGowan (1996). A Future for Teacher Education. In J. Siluka (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education,2nd ed. (pp. 1108-1149). New York: Macmillan.
  • 3[3]F. A. J. Korthiagen (1985). Reflective Teaching and Preservrice Teacher Education in the Netherlands. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 317-326.
  • 4[4]F. A. J. Korthagen (April 2001 ). Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
  • 5[5]M. F. Pajares (1992). Teachers's Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 307- 332.
  • 6[6]V. Richardson (1996). The Role of Attitude and Beliefs in Learning to Teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (EAs.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed.). NewYork: Macmillan. pp. 102-119.
  • 7[7]P. Siles, et al. (1985). Teacher Careers: Crisis and Continuities. Lewes, UK: FalmerPress.
  • 8[8]S. Veenman (1984). Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers. Review of Educational Research, vol. 54, no. 2.
  • 9[9]M. Wideen, J. Mayer-Smith & B. Moon (1998). A Critical Analysis of the Research on Learning to Teach: Making the Case for an Ecological Perspective on Inquiry. Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 130-178.
  • 10辛涛,教育研究,1994年,10卷,18页

共引文献873

同被引文献150

引证文献17

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部