期刊文献+

开口肋正交异性钢桥面疲劳设计参数研究 被引量:16

Fatigue Design Parameters for Orthotropic Steel Decks of Single Plane Cable-Stayed Bridges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评估重庆两江大桥单索面斜拉桥正交异性钢桥面板疲劳设计参数的合理性,对由盖板、板肋和横隔板组成的箱形正交异性钢桥面板模型进行了疲劳试验和有限元分析.基于应力等效方法,对桥面板、横隔板与纵肋三向交叉部位,进行了竖向和横向双向加载试验、等效实桥疲劳应力幅值2 000万次作用疲劳试验,在此基础上,分析了3种开孔方式、构造细节、横隔板厚度及铺装层厚度等因素对疲劳性能的影响.研究结果表明:横隔板厚度和铺装层厚度对疲劳性能的影响很大;与钥匙形和圆形相比,苹果形开孔结构的主拉应力最小,为13.7 MPa,疲劳性能最优.建议开口肋正交异性板构造横隔板厚度大于16 mm,并采用苹果形开孔方式. Experiment and finite element analysis (FEA) were conducted on the orthotropic steel decks of two single plane cable-stayed bridges in Chongqing municipality, China, to verify the fatigue design parameters. A full scale specimen with the actual connection details of the longitudinal ribs, crossbeams and deck plates was used for fatigue test. Vertical and horizontal fatigue loads were applied to the specimen under equivalent applied stresses for 20 million cycles. FEA was done to extend the ranges of design parameters verified by fatigue tests, such as cutout shape ( apple-shaped, key-shaped and circular), and thicknesses of plates and deck pavement. The experimental and FEA results shown that the crossbeam and pavement thickness played a significant role on fatigue performances of the orthotropic steel decks. The principal tension stress ( 13.7 MPa) near the apple-shaped cutout was the was the best in terms of fatigue performances. The plate at least 16 mm thick and the apple-shaped cutout were recommended for the crossbeam of the orthotropic steel decks.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期379-386,共8页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家863计划资助项目(2008AA11Z101) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWJTU11BR011) 西南交通大学百人计划项目的支持
关键词 正交异性钢桥面板 单索面斜拉桥 疲劳 试验 有限元分析 orthotropic steel deck single plane cable-stayed bridge fatigue experiment FEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献42

  • 1王春生,陈艾荣,陈惟珍.基于断裂力学的老龄钢桥剩余寿命与使用安全评估[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(2):42-48. 被引量:23
  • 2崔鑫,潘际炎,张玉玲.武汉天兴洲公铁两用大桥疲劳四线系数的研究[J].中国铁道科学,2006,27(3):13-17. 被引量:5
  • 3Tim Gurney. TRL State of the Art Review 8 : Fatigue of Steel Bridge Decks[M]. London: HMSO, 1992.
  • 4《中国大桥》编写组.中国大桥[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
  • 5Wolchuk R. Lessons from Weld Cracks in Orthotropie Decks on Three European Bridges [J]. J. Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1992,116(1):75 - 84.
  • 6Bocchieri W J, Fisher J W. Williamsburg Bridge Replacement Orthotropic Deck as Built Fatigue Test[R]. ATLSS Report No. 98-04, 1998.
  • 7BS 5400: Steel, Concrete, and Composite Bridges, Part10: Code of Practice for Fatigue[S]. 1980.
  • 8Kondo A, Yamada K,Kikuhchi Y, et al. Fatigue Strength of Field-Welded Rib Joints of Orthotropic Steel Decks[J].IABSE Colloquium, Lausanne, 1982,37 :777 - 784.
  • 9陈传饶.疲劳与断裂[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2005.
  • 10Wouter De Corte, Philippe Van Bogaert. An Evaluation of the Use of Fracture Mechanics for the Design of Orthotropic Decks [J]. Key Engineering Material, 2007: 285 - 288.

共引文献268

同被引文献112

引证文献16

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部