期刊文献+

基于客户应用的带钢表面质量评价 被引量:1

Surface Quality Evaluation of Strip Steel Based on Client Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 带钢传统的表面质量评价方法仅仅考虑了表面缺陷的数量及等级,而未考虑与客户应用密切相关的缺陷分布对表面质量的影响.在客户应用及带钢表面缺陷分布数据已知的情况下,建立线性规划模型,得出缺陷分布数据已知的带钢利用率,并将其与表面无缺陷的带钢利用率的比值作为衡量带钢表面质量的标准,由此得到一个基于客户应用的带钢表面质量评价方法,改变了传统的质量评价方法客户应用无法体现的局限性,保证了带钢表面质量评价的科学性及实用性.实例表明该方法可行、有效,且具有一定的推广性. The surface quality of strip steel is a very important aspect of strip steel quality. The traditional method of surface quality evaluation only considers the number and the level of defects, with regardless of the defect distribution which is closely related with the client application. This paper presents a linear programming model under the conditions of client application and the defect distribution data, then the strip utilization with and without surface defects are obtained, and their ratio can be used as a standard in testing the strip surface quality. This method avoids the limitations of the traditional quality evaluation which can't reflect the client application, ensuring the scientificity and practicality of the surface quality evaluation. The example indicates that the proposed method is feasible, effective and has a certain application.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期875-878,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2008AA04Z135) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N100603002)
关键词 带钢 表面质量评价 缺陷 分布 客户应用 线性规划 strip steel surface quality evaluation defect distribution~ client application linearprogramming
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Tsai D M, Lin P C, Lu C J. An independent component analysis-based filter design for defect detection in low-contrast surface images[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2006,39(9) : 1679 - 1694.
  • 2Caleb-Solly P, Smith J E. Adaptive surface inspection via interactive evolution[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2007,25(7) : 1058 - 1072.
  • 3吴艳萍,颜云辉,王永慧,李骏.冷轧带钢表面质量评价模型构造方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(11):1624-1627. 被引量:8
  • 4International Organization for Standardization. ISO9000: 2000 - Quality management systems--fundanlentals and vocabulary[S]. Geneva:ISO, 2000.
  • 5Loffi F H, Noora A A, Jahanshahloo G R, et al. A linear programming approach to test efficiency in multiobiective linear fractional programming problems [ J ]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010,34(12) :4179 - 4183.
  • 6Pourkarimi L, Yaghoobi M A, Mashinchi M. Determining maximal efficient faces in multiobjeetive linear programming problem [ J ]. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2009,354 ( 1 ) : 234 - 248.
  • 7Cavichia M C, Arenales M N. Pieeewise linear programming via interior points[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2000,27(13) :1303 - 1324.
  • 8Trkman P, Gradisar M. One-dimensional cutting stock optimization in consecutive time periods [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,179(2) :291 - 301.
  • 9Vasko F J, Cregger M L, Newhart D D, et al. A real-time one-dimensional cutting stock algorithm for balanced cutting patterns[J]. Operations Research Letters, 1993,14(5) : 275 - 282.
  • 10Belov G, Scheithauer G. A cutting plane algorithm for the one<limensional cutting stock problem with multiple stock lengths [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research , 2002,141 (2) : 274 - 294.

二级参考文献8

  • 1吕连宏,张征,李道峰,迟志淼,尚晓颖.应用层次分析法构建中国煤炭城市生态环境质量评价指标体系[J].能源环境保护,2005,19(5):53-56. 被引量:25
  • 2Wang Jianqiang.Multi-criteria decision-making approach with incomplete certain information based on ternary AHP[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2006,17(1):109-114. 被引量:5
  • 3Ong S K, Koh T H, Nee A Y C. Assessing the environmental impact of materials processing techniques using an analytical hierarchy process method[J ]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001,113(1/2/3) :424 - 431.
  • 4Yurdakul M. AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection [ J ]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004,146(3) : 365 - 376.
  • 5Das S, Chattopadhyay A B. Application of the analytic hierarchy process for estimating the state of tcol wear [ J ]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003,43(1):1 -6.
  • 6Throop J A, Aneshansley D J, Anger W C, et al. Quality evaluation of apples based on surface defects: development of an automated inspection system[ J ]. Pastharvest Biology and Technology, 2005,36 (3) : 281 - 290.
  • 7Mahi I M, Alreshaid K. Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process[J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005,23(7) :564 - 572.
  • 8Rhonda A H, Sevgi E, Joshua M, et al. An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 171 ( 1 ) : 290 - 295.

共引文献7

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部