期刊文献+

环境建构论的方法论意义 被引量:1

Methodological Significance of Environmental Construction Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以"环境与社会"为切入点,考察了环境社会学的演进过程,阐述了环境建构论的理论主张实质是要在知识社会学里研究环境问题,指出其方法论的意义在于大大降低了关于环境问题建构中的自然要素的决定论地位,而突出了社会或文化实践的解释学意义。把人们从对环境问题的关注转向到对环境与社会关系的关注。 As environmental sociology focuses on environment and society,this paper studies the evolution process of environmental sociology.Then it states that the essence of environmental construction theory is to study environmental issues in knowledge sociology.In addition,it points out that the methodological significance of environmental construction theory lies in that it decreases the decisive status of natural elements in environmental construction.Meanwhile,it emphasizes hermeneutic importance pertaining to social or cultural practice.Therefore,it makes people change their concern from environmental issues to the relationship between environment and society.
作者 蔡萍
出处 《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第2期39-42,91,共4页 Journal of Hohai University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金 太原科技大学博士启动基金(20102008) 中华环境保护基金会TOTO水环境基金
关键词 环境与社会 环境实在论 环境建构论 environment and society environmental realism environmental construction theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1DUNLAP R E, CATIDN J R W R. What environmental sociologists have in common (whether coneemed with "built" or "natural" environments) [ J ]. Sociological Inquiry, 1983 (53) : 113-135.
  • 2CATIDN J R W R,DUNLAP R E. Enviromnental sociology: a new paradigm[J]. The American Sociologist, 1978(13) : 41- 49.
  • 3赵万里,蔡萍.建构论视角下的环境与社会——西方环境社会学的发展走向[J].国外社会科学,2009(2):12-19. 被引量:7
  • 4DUNLAP R E, MICHELSON W. Handbook of environmental sociology[ M ]. Westport CT: Greenwood Press, 2002:1.
  • 5HANNIGAN J A. Environmental sociology: a social construc-tionist perspective[ M]. London: Routledge, 1995.
  • 6MACNAGHTEN P, URRY J. Towards a sociology of nature [J]. Sociology, 1995,29(2):203-220.
  • 7HAJER M. The politics of environmental discourse : ecological modernization and the policy process [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  • 8DIZARD J E.Going wild:hunting, animal rights, and the contested meaning of nature [ M ]. Amhearst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994.
  • 9HANNIGAN J A. Environmental sociology: a social construetionist perspective[ M]. London: Routledge, 1995 : 2.
  • 10BECK U. The risk society: towards a new modemity[M]. London: Sage, 1992.

二级参考文献36

  • 1M. Aronoff and V. Gunter, Defining Disaster: Local Constructions for Recovering in the Aftermath of Chemical Contamination, Social Problems, 9, 1992.
  • 2J. Burgess and C. M. Harrison, The Circulation of Claims in the Cultural Politics of Environmental Change, in A. Hansen et al. ( eds. ), The Mass Media and Environmental Issues, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1993.
  • 3D.J. Davidson and S. Friekel, Understanding Environmental Governance: a Critical Review, Organization & Environment, 17 ( 4 ), 2004.
  • 4A. Hansen, The Media and the Social Construction of the Environment, Media, Culture & Society, 13(4) ,1991.
  • 5D.M. Hart and D. G. Victor, Scientific Elites and the Making of U. S. Policy for Climate Change Research, 1957 - 1974, Social Studies of Science, 23,1993.
  • 6A. Mazur and J. Lee, Sounding the Global Alarm : Environmental Issues in the U. S. National News, Social Studies of Science, 23,1993.
  • 7R. Murphy, The Sociological Construction of Science Without Nature, Sociology, 28,1994.
  • 8J. W. Spencer and E. Triche, Media Constructions of Risk and Safety: Differential Framings of Hazard Events, Sociological Inquiry ,64(2), 1994.
  • 9R. Stallings, Media Discourse and the Social Construction of Risk, Social Problems, 37,1990.
  • 10S. Ungar, The Rise and (Relative) Decline of Global Wanning as a Social Problem, The Sociological Quarterly ,33,1992.

共引文献6

同被引文献94

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部