摘要
科学引文索引在生物医学领域的文献、作者、期刊评价中发挥着重要作用。F1000医学版的推出为医学文献、期刊的评价提供了新的途径。本研究的目的是通过对F1000医学版收录文献的分析并与SCI进行对比，研究SCI和F1000医学版对评价医学期刊的差异，为有效提高医教研水平提供帮助。方法：获取F1000医学版从推出到2011年11月收录的被推荐文献，按照所属期刊、年度进行统计分析。通过检索medline获得各种期刊、各年度的发表文献总量，获得各种期刊、各年度的推荐比并排序，并与SCI相对比。结果：F1000医学版与SCI共同收录的医学期刊共1620种。在这1620种期刊中，按推荐此、推荐文献量和IF值分别进行排序，相互之间排序结果相差较大。结论：F1000医学版对评价医学期刊的权威性的评价与SCI存在较大差异。F1000医学版的评价在对医学期刊的评价中发挥着与SCI同等重要的作用。
Science Citation Index （SCI） plays an important role in evaluating documents, authors and journals in medical field. F1000 gives an alternative to evaluations on documents and journals. The purpose of this study is to find differences of evaluating outcomes between SCI and FI000 medical edition by means of comparison between F1000 metrological analysis and SCI data. Methods： Data were collected from FI000 medical edition from very beginning to November, 2011 and analyzed from the aspects of year and journals that they belong to. We searched OVID Medline to acquire total numbers of documents of each journal and each year and then calculated the suggest ratio of these journals by years or total. After sorting by suggest number and by suggest ratio, we compared it with SCI data. Result： 1620 journals were indexed by these two evaluating tools. There were big differences in sorting outcomes between sorting by suggest number, by suggest ratio and by IF. Conclusion： There were big differences in evaluating outcomes between SCI and F1000 medical edition when medical journals were evaluated. F1000 medical edition plays the same important role as SCI in evaluating medical journals.
出处
《数字图书馆论坛》
2012年第5期67-70,共4页
Digital Library Forum
