摘要
学科与实践是既具有内在联系而又相互区别的两个范畴。学科的边界是刚性的,而实践领域的边界却是开放的。在形式化阶段,教育完全是一项实践着的活动,具有很高的边界渗透度。但近代以来以形成严整的学科边界为圭臬的倾向使学科在数量和质量上获得较大发展的同时,与社会以及人的发展之间的关系被隔绝。要改变这种状况,就要从实践领域的角度审视教育。作为实践领域的教育是人的自我建构,需要从生活和实践的立场加以把握。教育理论只有将其视野指向人类精神得以生长和存在的生活世界,才能获得存在和发展的根基。
Discipline and practice are the two categories that have both the inner link and difference between each other. The disciplinary boundary is rigid, while the boundary of the practical field is open. At the formalized stage, education is nothing less than a practicing activity, with very high boundary penetration. However, the tendency of giving priority to forming disciplinary boundary in neat formation has not only made disciplines obtain greater development in quantity and quality, but also isolated the relations with the society and the human development. To change this situation, we should go through education from the view of practical field. Education in practical field is the self-construction of human, which needs to be understood from life and practice. Only when educational theories point to the life world so that human spirit can grow and exist, can we obtain the foundation of existence and development.
出处
《教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期15-21,共7页
Educational Research
基金
全国教育科学“十一五”规划2009年度教育部重点课题“基础教育改革与教育理论创新研究”(项目批准号:DAA090155)研究成果
2009年度“甘肃省属高校基本科研业务费专项”支持
关键词
学科
教育实践
教育理论
边界的渗透度
discipline, education practice, education theory, penetration of boundary