期刊文献+

经尿道双极等离子体电切术治疗高危前列腺增生症256例 被引量:5

Transurethral resection of prostate with liasmakinetic energy in the treatment of high risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道双极等离子体电切术(PKRP)治疗高危良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的安全性及疗效。方法:采用PKRP治疗高危BPH患者256例,前列腺大小45~109.4g,平均60±5g,随访3~18个月。结果:手术安全顺利,时间20~60min,出血少,无水中毒与尿失禁发生,无死亡病例。按国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)由术前25.5±4.1分下降至术后9.0±2.1分;生活质量评分由术前5.0±1.0分,下降至术后2.1±0.5分;最大尿流率由术前6.5±2.8ml/s上升至术后14.3±5.2ml/s;残余尿由术前121±12.5ml降至术后18.1±13.6ml。手术前后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:充分术前准备的情况下PKRP是高危BPH新的治疗方法,该术式具有安全性高,手术指征相对较宽、易掌握、并发症少、疗效确切等优点。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PKRP in the treatment of high risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods:256 cases of high risk BPH.Patients were treated with PKRP,The mean age of patients was 74.6(70~89)years;and the prostate weight was 60±5(45~109.4)g.All the cases were followed up for 3~8months.Results:All operations were successful.The average operative time were(20~60) min.There were less intraoperative bleeding,no postoperative temporary urinary in continence,no Turs,and no death.Tn the preoperation,IPSS,QOL,Qmax,PVR were(25.5±4.1)scores,(5.0±1.0)scores,(6.5±2.8)ml/s,(121±12.5)ml.While in the postoperation,these paraments were(9.0±2.1)scores,(2.1±0.5)scores,14.3±5.2)ml/s,(18.1±13.6)ml.Respectively,significant difference were found between the preoperation and post operation(P〈0.01).Conclusion:PKRP is a new treatment option for high risk patients with BPH.Our experience indicated that PKRP is a less complicated safe and effective approach.
作者 王森 薛佳
机构地区 陕西省友谊医院
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期697-699,共3页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
关键词 前列腺增生/治疗 经尿道前列腺切除术/方法 @双级等离子体 Prostatic hyperplasia/therapy Transurethral resection of prostate/ Methods @Prostatic hyperplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322.
  • 2Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143.
  • 3Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247.
  • 4Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269.
  • 5Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70.
  • 6Ekengern J, Hahn R G. Complications during transurethral raporization of the prostste. Urology, 1996, 48:424--427.
  • 7叶敏.经尿道电汽化术治疗前列腺增生症[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(11):702-704. 被引量:69
  • 8周辉,周志耀,郑世广,鲁德生,徐宪章,吴幸辰,杨立,王忠棠.经尿道前列腺气化电切术治疗BPH疗效的初步观察(附32例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1998,13(6):250-252. 被引量:116
  • 9杨忠新,谭毅,孙祥生,朱文胜,韩官红.铲状电极经尿道气化治疗前列腺增生疗效观察(附68例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1999,14(1):8-10. 被引量:83
  • 10王庭镇,陈祥鹏,李迎东,朱传明,袁树森.前列腺增生症不同手术方法的治疗评价[J].华中医学杂志,1999,23(3):126-127. 被引量:2

共引文献313

同被引文献25

  • 1杨明莹,王剑松,王云娥,刘华.经尿道双极等离子电切术治疗高危前列腺增生症患者护理体会[J].实用医院临床杂志,2007,4(1):93-94. 被引量:5
  • 2高琳,徐万海,李庆,李建章,李际桐,王晓民.经尿道前列腺等离子双极汽化电切术治疗高危前列腺增生症[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2007,41(3):260-262. 被引量:6
  • 3吴阶平 主编.泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科技出版社,1996.286.
  • 4Descazeaud A, Azzousi AR, Ballereau C, et al. Impact of oral antico- agulation on morbidily of transurethral resec-tion of the prostate [J]. World J Urol, 2010, 10(2): 1007-1012.
  • 5Chen H, Tsai YS, Tong YC. Correlations among cardiovascular risk factors, prostate blood flow, and prostate volume in patients with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Urology, 2012, 79(2): 409-414.
  • 6Seung HL, Byung HC, Chung SK, et al. Survey on benign prostatic hyperplasia distribution and treatment patterns for men with lower urinary tract symptoms visiting urologists at general hospitals in Ko- rea: a prospective, noncontrolled, observational cohort study [J]. Urology, 2012, 79(6): 1379-1384.
  • 7Lei L, Liang W, Min F, et al. Two-year outcome of high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia patients treated with transurethral prostate re- section by plasmakinetic or conventional procedure [J]. Urology, 2012, 80(2): 389-395.
  • 8Steven AK. Clinical outcomes after combined therapy with dutaste- ride plus tamsulosin or either monotherapy in men with benign pros- tatic hyperplasia (BPH) by baseline characteristics: 4-year results from the randomized, double-blind combination of Avodart and Tam- sulosin (CombAT) Trial [J]. The Journal of Urology, 2012, 187(2): 583-584.
  • 9李大文,李恩春,杨文涛,卢尚光,李异军,董瑜,周杰彬,吴刚,韦均元.经尿道等离子体双极电切治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症(附150例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(11):1136-1138. 被引量:12
  • 10丁俊峰,王冰捷,蔡惠林,李东辉,黄雪松,窦海峰.高危高龄前列腺增生症经尿道电切手术的治疗体会[J].中国临床研究,2010,23(1):48-49. 被引量:7

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部