期刊文献+

基于GIS的秦岭山系视觉景观评价 被引量:6

Evaluation of visual landscape based on GIS in Qinling Mountains
下载PDF
导出
摘要 视觉景观评价是景观开发利用和保护的基础。采用遥感和地理信息系统技术,在对秦岭山系景观进行分类和制图的基础上,运用模糊层次综合分析方法,从景观视觉质量和视觉敏感度两方面综合评价了秦岭山系视觉景观资源。结果表明:阔叶林和草甸景观具有较好的视觉质量,美景度较高,针叶林、混交林和水体景观次之,而草丛和城镇景观视觉质量较差;视觉景观最敏感区主要分布在距道路500 m内,视觉景观敏感度与道路、观赏视距有较强的相关性;秦岭山系视觉景观资源总体较好,很好级和较好级视觉景观资源占研究区总面积的77.83%,主要分布在海拔较高地区。 Evaluation of visual landscape was the basis for landscape exploitation and protection. Using remote sensing (RS) and geographical information system (GIS), the landscape classification and maps were produced. The comprehensive evaluation of visual landscape resources in Qinling Mountains was carried out based on the results of scenic beauty evaluation (SBE) and visual landscape sensitivity assessment with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy mathematics theory. The results showed that broad-leaf forest and meadow landscape had best visual landscape quality, and followed by coniferous forest, mixed forest and water landscape. While the wild grassland and residential area were the worse. The highest sensitive visual landscape area distributed along the main roads and located within the range of less than 500 meters from roads. The visual landscape sensitivity was strongly related to roads and the horizontal distance from a viewer. The overall landscape visual resource was good. The best-level and good-level visual landscape resource accounts for 77.83% in the region which distributed in the high elevation area.
出处 《广东农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期15-18,F0002,共5页 Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(40901289) 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB421104) 衡阳师范学院人才引进科研启动项目(11B51)
关键词 景观质量评价 视觉景观敏感度 模糊评价 地理信息系统 秦岭山系 landscape quality assessment visual landscape sensitivity fuzzy evaluation geographic information system QinlingMountains
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1裘亦书,高峻,詹起林.山地视觉景观的GIS评价——以广东南昆山国家森林公园为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(4):1009-1020. 被引量:24
  • 2Buhyoff G J,Leuschner W A. Estimation psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J].Forestry Science,1978,(01):424-432.
  • 3Kaplan R. The analysis of perception via preference:A strategy for studding how the environment is experienced[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,1985,(02):161-176.
  • 4肖笃宁,解伏菊,魏建兵.景观价值与景观保护评价[J].地理科学,2006,26(4):506-512. 被引量:61
  • 5张慧,沈渭寿,江腊沙,邹长新.青藏铁路沿线景观保护评价方法研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):574-582. 被引量:34
  • 6Sheppard S,Picard P. Visual quality impacts of forest pest activity at the landscape level:a synthesis of published knowledge and research needs[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,(04):321-342.
  • 7Acar C,Kurdoglu B C,Kurdoglu O. Public preferences for visual quality and management in Kackar Mountains National Park(Turkey)[J].The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,2006,(06):499-512.doi:10.1080/13504500609469699.
  • 8Arriaza M,Caas-Ortega J F,Caas-Madueo J A. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2004.115-125.
  • 9Müderriso(g)lu H,Ero(g)lu E,(O)zkan(S). Visual perception of tree forms[J].Building and Environment,2006,(06):796-806.
  • 10Mok J,Landphair H C,Naderi J R. Landscape improvement impacts on roadside safety in Texas[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,(03):263-274.

二级参考文献141

共引文献684

同被引文献75

引证文献6

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部