期刊文献+

融资约束与代理成本对上市公司非效率投资的影响——基于双边随机边界模型的实证度量 被引量:47

The Influence of Financial constraint and Agency Cost on Investment Inefficiency of listed Firms:An empirical Measurement based on Two-tier stochastic frontier Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在有效地控制企业最优投资水平的前提下,本文将融资约束与代理成本同时纳入到前沿异质性双边随机边界模型(Two-tier stochastic frontier model)框架下对我国上市公司的非效率投资程度进行了实证度量,并探讨了各种财务因素对融资约束与代理成本的影响。实证结果表明:融资约束的存在使得上市公司的投资支出较最优水平低了37.5%,而代理成本导致上市公司的投资支出超出其最优水平的30.6%,两者的净效果使我国上市公司整体上表现为投资不足,投资不足率为6.9%。此外,流动资产净额和资本存量的增加有助于缓解公司面临的融资约束程度,而规模较大、持有较多自由现金流的公司内部代理问题更为严重,并且不同规模和地区之间的上市公司非效率投资程度存在较大的差异。 In a perfect situation, the investment of a firm can reach to its optimal level which is totally decided by invest opportunity. In reality, however, the actual investment would unilaterally deviate from its optimal level because of defects of stock market as well as agency problem. At present, the most popular theories concerning investment activities are financial constraint and agency cost which are based on Q model. Nevertheless, the measurement bias of Tobin's Q and the variation of grouping criteria would lead to disagreement in the empirical results. Other previous studies which estimate the investment efficiency by residual of OLS regression can not avoid the problems that the residual of the OLS regression would be affected by white noise and the residual expectation is zero, and hence influences the accuracy of the investment efficiency. The limitation of previous researches provides us an opportunity to further study the issue of investment efficiency.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期119-126,共8页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(70525005)
关键词 融资约束 代理成本 非效率投资 双边随机边界模型 financial constraint agency cost investment inefficiency two-tier stochastic frontier model
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Fazzari S, Hubbard R, Petersen B. Financing constraints and corporate investment [ J ]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988, (1) :141 - 195.
  • 2Jensen M. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers[ J]. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76 (2) : 323 - 329.
  • 3冯巍.内部现金流量和企业投资——来自我国股票市场上市公司财务报告的证据[J].经济科学,1999(1):51-57. 被引量:200
  • 4梅丹.我国上市公司固定资产投资规模财务影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(5):80-86. 被引量:45
  • 5唐雪松,周晓苏,马如静.上市公司过度投资行为及其制约机制的实证研究[J].会计研究,2007(7):44-52. 被引量:348
  • 6Efiekson T, Whited T. Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and "q" [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2000 : 1027 - 1057.
  • 7Cummins J, Hassett K, Oliner S. Investment behavior, observable expectations, and internal funds [ J]. The American Economic Review, 2006, 96 (3) :796 - 810.
  • 8Schiantarelli F. Financial constraints and investment: methodological issues and international evidence [ J ]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1996, 12 (2) :70 - 89.
  • 9Kaplan S, Zingales L. Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112 ( 1 ) : 169 - 215.
  • 10Richardson S. Over-investment of free cash flow [ J ]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, 11 (2) :159 -189.

二级参考文献65

共引文献784

同被引文献777

引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部