期刊文献+

茄子果形的QTL定位 被引量:17

QTL Analysis for Fruit Shape in Eggplant Based on Genetic Linkage Map
原文传递
导出
摘要 以圆茄高代自交系106和长茄高代自交系113为亲本,利用其F2群体构建了一张包括23个SSR标记和85个AFLP标记,共15个连锁群的复合遗传图谱。该图谱覆盖基因组长度1 007.9 cM,平均图距9.3 cM,长度和密度符合定位标准。采用MapQTL4.0软件并结合MQM作图法对果形QTL进行定位分析,定位到与果形指数相关的两个QTL,位于第1和第12连锁群上,表型贡献率分别为20.8%和41.5%;与果长相关的5个QTL,位于第1、8、11、12、14连锁群上,表型贡献率分别为16.5%、36.8%、9.8%、45.0%和41.9%;与果径相关的两个QTL,位于第1和第5连锁群上,表型贡献率分别为16.2%和15.8%。果形指数、果长和果径QTL同时定位在第1连锁群上,且与AFLP标记M23E21B距离3.5 cM,表明果形性状与该标记紧密连锁。 An AFLP and SSR genetic linkage map was constructed in eggplant (Solanum melongena L. ) with an intraspecific F2 population derived from a cross between the round eggplant inbred line ‘106' and the long eggplant inbred line ‘113' . The generated map consisted of 15 linkage groups with 85 AFLP markers and 23 SSR markers, a total coverage of 1 007.9 cM and an average interval of 9.3 cM. The markers distributed randomly across the groups and could be done preliminary QTL mapping in MQM using MapQTL4.0. Two QTLs for fruit shape index were in the 1st and 12th linkage group, and explained 20.8% and 41.5% ofphenotypic variances; Five QTLs for fruit length were in the 1st, 8th, llth, 12th and 14th linkage group, and explained 16.5%, 36.8%, 9.8%, 45.0% and 41.9% phenotypic variances; And two QTLs for fruit width were detected in the 1st and 5th linkage group explaining 16.2% and 15.8% of phenotypic variances. QTLs for fruit shape index, fruit length and fruit diameter were located in the 1st linkage group, and their distance was 3.5 cM with the AFLP marker M23E21B which was closely linked to the fruit shape traits.
出处 《园艺学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1115-1122,共8页 Acta Horticulturae Sinica
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BADB8B01) 科技部国际科技合作项目(2010DFA32350) 农业部园艺作物生物学与种质创制重点实验室项目
关键词 茄子 果形 分子遗传图谱 QTL eggplant fruit shape genetic linkage map QTL
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1AnikbSt~gel, EzioPortis, LauraToppino, GiuseppeLeonardoRotino, SergioLanteri. 2008. Gene-based microsateUite development for mapping and phylogeny studies in eggplant. BMC Genomies 2008, 9:357 - 370.
  • 2Ben Chaim A, Borovsky J, Rao G, Gur A, Zamir D, Paran I. 2006. Comparative QTL mapping of fruit size and shape in tomato and pepper. Isr J Plant Sci, 54:191 - 203.
  • 3Ben Chaim A, Paran I, Grube R-C, Jahn M, van Wijk R, Peleman J. 2001. QTL mapping of fruit-related traits in pepper ( Capsicum annuum) . Theor Appl Genet, 102: 1016- 1028.
  • 4Brewer M T, Lang L, Fujimura K, Dujmovic N, Gray S, van der Knaap E. 2006. Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species. Plant Physiology, 141 (1): 15 - 25.
  • 5曹必好,雷建军,孙秀东,陈国菊,孟成民.茄子RAPD分子标记图谱的构建[J].园艺学报,2006,33(5):1092-1092. 被引量:11
  • 6Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay M C, Lester R N, Tanksley S D. 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 161 (4): 1697 - 1711.
  • 7盖均镒,章元明,王建康.植物数量性状遗传体系.北京:科学出版社,2003.120~126
  • 8Gonzalo M J, van der Knaap E. 2008. A comparative analysis into the genetic bases of morphology in tomato varieties exhibiting elongated fruit shape. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 116 (5): 647 - 656.
  • 9Gousset C, Collonnier C, Mulya K, Mariska I, Rotino G L, Besse P, Servaes A, Sihachakr D. 2005. Solanum torvum, as a useful source of resistance against bacterial and fungal diseases for improvement of eggplant (S. melongena L.) . Plant Science, 168 (2): 319 - 327.
  • 10黄锐明,谢晓凯,卢永奋,卢海强,柳江海.茄子果长遗传效应的初步研究[J].广东农业科学,2006,33(7):25-26. 被引量:9

二级参考文献76

共引文献156

同被引文献364

引证文献17

二级引证文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部