期刊文献+

丙泊酚对全脑缺血大鼠海马CA1区神经病理学和谷氨酸转运体1表达的影响 被引量:7

Effect of propofol on neuropathology and glutamate transporter-1 expression in CA1 hippocampus of ischemic rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察丙泊酚对全脑缺血大鼠海马CA1区谷氨酸转运体1(GLT-1)表达的影响。方法采用四血管闭塞法建立全脑缺血模型;脑缺血前3 h静脉输注丙泊酚90 mg·kg-1,首次剂量(总剂量的1/3)15 min内推注,剩余剂量持续输注1 h。脑缺血再灌注后于0,12,24,48 h和7 d取材。光镜下观察海马CA1区的组织学分级和神经元密度,Western印迹法检测海马CA1区GLT-1的表达。结果组织学分级结果显示,假手术组及丙泊酚对照组所有动物均为0级,脑缺血模型组有5只动物均为Ⅲ级。丙泊酚+脑缺血组中3只动物的组织学分级为0级,2只动物为Ⅰ级。假手术组及丙泊酚对照组神经元密度分别为185±12及(181±11)mm-1。模型组中锥体细胞几乎全部死亡。与脑缺血组相比,丙泊酚+脑缺血组神经元密度为(125±14)mm-1,说明存活细胞数显著增高(P<0.05)。Western印迹结果显示,与同一时间点的假手术组相比,脑缺血后12 h,GLT-1的表达显著增强(0.31±0.03 vs 0.38±0.04),随后逐渐降低,在脑缺血后7 d显著低于假手术组(0.19±0.03 vs 0.29±0.04)。丙泊酚对照组GLT-1的表达保持在较高的水平(0.47±0.05),直到7 d才降至假手术组水平0.29±0.03。在再灌注后24和48 h时,丙泊酚明显逆转脑缺血造成的GLT-1表达的下降,GLT-1表达分别为0.45±0.04 vs 0.29±0.04和0.47±0.05 vs 0.27±0.04(P<0.05),在7 d时与假手术组相当。结论丙泊酚可保护海马CA1区的锥体细胞抵御缺血打击,并上调了大鼠海马CA1区GLT-1的表达。 OBJECTIVE To observe the effect of propofol on glutamate transporter-1 ( GLT-1 ) expression of the CA1 hippocampus by Western blotting analysis in global brain ischemic rat. METHODS A rat global cerebral ischemic model was established by four-vessel occlusion. Propo-fol 90 mg·kg-1 was infused via veins at 3 h before brain ischemia. The initial dose (1/3 of total dose) of propofol was injected for 15 min while the rest of propofol was infused persistently for 1 h. Rats were sacrificed with decapitation at 0, 12 , 24, 48 h and 7 d after ischemia/reperfusion. The histological grade(HG) and neuronal density(ND) of the CA1 hippocampus were evaluated under a light microscope. The effect of propofol on GLT-1 expression of the CA1 hippocampus was observed by Western blotting. RESULTS HG was 0 in sham group and propofol control group, and grade Ⅲ in ischemia group. In propofol + brain ischemia group, the HG was 0 in three rats, and grade Ⅰ in the rest. ND was 185±12 and (181±11 ) mm-1 in sham group and propofol control group, respectively. Almost all the pyramidal neurons in the CA1 hippocampus of ischemin group died. Compared with ischemia model group, ND was (125±14)mm-1 in propofol + brain ischemia group, and the surviving pyramidal neurons significantly increased ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with sham group at the corresponding time, GLT-1 expression significantly increased at 12 h after ischemia (0.38±0.04 vs 0. 31±0.03 ), then gradually decreased with time, and significantly decreased at 7 d after brain ischemia(0.19 ±0.03 vs O. 29±0.04). GLT-1 expression of the CA1 hippocampus remained at a high level (0.47 ± 0.05 ) after propofol infusion and reached 0.29±0.03 at 7 d in propofol control group. Decrease in GLT-1 expression induced by global brain ischemia was prevented by propofol infusion. At 24 and 48 h time points, GLT-1 expression of the CA1 hippocampus reached 0.45±0.04 vs 0. 29±0.04 and 0.47±0.05 vs 0. 27 ± 0.04, respectively ( P 〈 0.05 ), as in sham group. CONCLUSION Propofol protects pyramidal neurons in the CA1 hippocampus against ischemia insult by persistent infusion before brain ischemia and up-regulates the GLT-1 expres- sion in the CA1 hippocampus.
出处 《中国药理学与毒理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期299-304,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology
关键词 丙泊酚 脑缺血 海马 谷氨酸转运体 propofol brain ischemia hippocampus glutamate transporter
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Peters CE, Korcok J, Gelb AW, Wilson JX. Anesthetic concentrations of propofol protect against oxidative stress in primary astrocyte cultures: comparison with hypother- mia[J]. Anesthesiology, 2001, 94(2):313-321.
  • 2Daskalopoulos R, Korcok J, Farhangkhgoee P, Karmazyn M, Gelb AW, Wilson JX. Propofol protection of sodium- hydrogen exchange activity sustains glutamate uptake dur-ing oxidative stress[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001, 93(5) :1199- 1294.
  • 3Ergtin R, Akdemir G, Sen S, Tarsi A, Ergtingr F. Neuroprotective effects of propofol following global cere- bral ischemia in rats [ J ]. Neurosurg Rev, 2002, 25 (1-2) :95-98.
  • 4Ito H, Watanabe Y, Isshiki A, Uchino H. Neuroprotec- tive properties of propofol and midazolam, but not pento- barbital, on neuronal damage induced by forebrain is- chemia, based on the GABAA receptors [ J ]. Acta An- aesthesiol Scand, 1999, 43(2) :153-162.
  • 5Kaisti KK, Metsahonkala L, Ter'as M, Oikonen V, Aaho S, J/iaskelainen S, et al. Effects of surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomo- graphy [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2002, 96 ( 6 ) : 1358-1370.
  • 6Kadoi Y, Saito S, Kunimoto F, Goto F, Fujita N. Com- parative effects of propofol versus fentanyl on cerebral oxygenation state during normothermic cardiopuimonary bypass and postoperative cognitive dysfunction [ J ]. AnnThorac Surg, 2003, 75(3):840-846.
  • 7Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE, Petersen CB, Mau S, Hauerberg J, et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors: a randomized prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol-fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98(2) :329-336.
  • 8Lingamaneni R, Birch ML, Hemmings HC Jr. Wide- spread inhibition of sodium channel-dependent glutamate release from isolated nerve terminals by isoflurane and propofol [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2001,95 (6) : 1460-1466.
  • 9Ratnakumari L, Hemmings HC Jr. Effects of propofol on sodium channel-dependent sodium influx and glutamate release in rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes[ J]. Anesthe- siology, 1997, 84(2) :428-439.
  • 10Sitar SM, Hanifi-Moghaddam P, Gelb A, Cechetto DF, Siushansian R, Wilson JX. Propofol prevents peroxide- induced inhibition of glutamate transport in cultured as-trocytes [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90 (5) : 1446-1453.

同被引文献57

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部