期刊文献+

垂直面型对安氏Ⅲ类错畸形牙齿移动速度的影响 被引量:2

Effect of different vertical craniofacial morphology types in class Ⅲ malocclusion on teeth movements speeds
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种垂直面型的安氏Ⅲ类错畸形牙齿移动速度。方法随机选取3种垂直面型的安氏Ⅲ类错畸形各24例,采用方丝弓矫治技术,以上、下颌的第一磨牙做支抗,远中移动尖牙,对尖牙向远中移动和磨牙向近中移动的速度进行比较。结果高角型病例牙齿移动速度最快,为每28 d移动0.66~1.78 mm;低角型最慢,为每28 d移动0.18~1.12 mm;均角型居中,为每28 d移动0.44~1.52 mm。安氏Ⅲ类高角、均角、低角型错牙合畸形牙齿移动速度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 3种垂直面型对安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的牙齿移动速度有显著影响。 Objective To compare the speed of teeth movements among different vertical craniofacial morphology types in class Ⅲ malocclusion cases.Methods Twenty-four high-angle cases,twenty four average-angle cases and twenty four low-angle cases were involved in this study.Modern standard edgewise orthodontic technique was used to move the canine distally,anchored with the first molar.The speed of teeth movements was compared.Results The differences in speed of teeth movements among different vertical craniofacial morphology were proved significantly.The speed in high-angle cases was 0.72-1.46 mm per 28 days,the speed in average-angle ones was 0.46-0.98 mm per 28 days and the speed in low-angle ones was 0.21-0.78 mm per 28 days.Conclusion The vertical craniofacial morphology is a critical factor affecting the speeds of teeth movements in class Ⅲ malocclusion.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2012年第6期312-315,共4页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
关键词 安氏Ⅲ类错畸形 移动速度 正畸矫治设计 垂直面型 Class Ⅲ malocclusion Movements speed Orthodontic treatment design Vertical craniofacial morphology
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

  • 1邹冰爽,曾祥龙,傅民魁.高角和低角病例的诊断、临床特征及正畸治疗特点[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1999,15(1):39-42. 被引量:71
  • 2叶庆,辜岷,赵志河,赵美英.恒牙初期安氏Ⅱ~1错不同骨面型颅底形态变化的头影测量分析[J].上海口腔医学,2004,13(6):484-486. 被引量:6
  • 3林新平,林久祥,Arild Stenvik.高低角型男孩颅面部软组织侧貌水平向生长变化的纵向研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(3):246-249. 被引量:9
  • 4Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: Its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod,1996,66(2):95.
  • 5Horiuchi A, Hotokeraka H, Kobayashi K. Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,114(3):311.
  • 6Vardimon AD, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y, et al. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,114(5):520.
  • 7Hoeve TA, Mulie RM. The effect of anterioposterior incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminography. J Clin Orthod,1976, 10(10):804.
  • 8Foley TF,Duncan PG.Soft tissue profile changes in late adolescent males[J].AngleOrthod,1997,67(5):373-380.
  • 9Mihalik CA,Proffit WR,Phillips C.Long-term follow-up of Class Ⅱ adults treated withorthodontic camouflage:a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes[J].Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop,2003,123(3):266-278.
  • 10Arnett GW,Jelic JS,Kim J,et al.Softtissue cevhalometric analysis:diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1999,116(3):239-253.

共引文献46

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部