期刊文献+

Coronary bifurcation angle from 3-D predicts clinical outcomes after stenting bifurcation lesions 被引量:2

Coronary bifurcation angle from 3-D predicts clinical outcomes after stenting bifurcation lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background The predictive value of bifurcation angle (BA) for worse events after stenting bifurcation lesions remains to be unknown. The present study was to investigate the dynamic change of BA and clinical relevance for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated by drug-eluting stent (DES). Methods BA was calculated by 3-D quantitative coronary analysis from 347 patients in DKCRUSH-II study. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary end points were the rate of binary restenosis and stent thrombosis at 12-month. Results Stenting was associated with the reduction of distal BA. The cut-off value of distal BA for predicting MACE was 60°. Distal BA in 〈60° group had less reduction after stenting ((-1.96+13.58)°vs. (-12.12±23.58)°, P 〈0.001); two-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA (△(-4.05±14.20)°), compared to single stent group (4+1.55±11.73, P=0.003); the target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR and MACE rate was higher in one-stent group (16.5%, 19.0% and 21.5%), compared to two-stent group (3.8%, P=0.002; 7.5%, P=0.016; and 9.8%, P=0.024), respectively. Among patients in ≥60° group, there were no significant differences in distal BA, stent thrombosis (ST), MI, MACE, death, TLR, TVR between one- and two-stent groups; after stenting procedure, there was only slight change of distal BA in left anterior descending (LAD)-Ieft circumflex (LCX) subgroup (from (88.54±21.33)° at baseline to (82.44±31.72)° post-stenting), compared to either LAD-diagonal branch (Di), or LCX-obtuse marginal branch (OM), or IRCA distal (RCAd) (all P 〈0.001 ). Conclusion Two-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA. DK crush stenting had reduced rate of MACE in patients in 〈60° group, compared to one-stent technique. Background The predictive value of bifurcation angle (BA) for worse events after stenting bifurcation lesions remains to be unknown. The present study was to investigate the dynamic change of BA and clinical relevance for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated by drug-eluting stent (DES). Methods BA was calculated by 3-D quantitative coronary analysis from 347 patients in DKCRUSH-II study. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary end points were the rate of binary restenosis and stent thrombosis at 12-month. Results Stenting was associated with the reduction of distal BA. The cut-off value of distal BA for predicting MACE was 60°. Distal BA in 〈60° group had less reduction after stenting ((-1.96+13.58)°vs. (-12.12±23.58)°, P 〈0.001); two-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA (△(-4.05±14.20)°), compared to single stent group (4+1.55±11.73, P=0.003); the target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR and MACE rate was higher in one-stent group (16.5%, 19.0% and 21.5%), compared to two-stent group (3.8%, P=0.002; 7.5%, P=0.016; and 9.8%, P=0.024), respectively. Among patients in ≥60° group, there were no significant differences in distal BA, stent thrombosis (ST), MI, MACE, death, TLR, TVR between one- and two-stent groups; after stenting procedure, there was only slight change of distal BA in left anterior descending (LAD)-Ieft circumflex (LCX) subgroup (from (88.54±21.33)° at baseline to (82.44±31.72)° post-stenting), compared to either LAD-diagonal branch (Di), or LCX-obtuse marginal branch (OM), or IRCA distal (RCAd) (all P 〈0.001 ). Conclusion Two-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA. DK crush stenting had reduced rate of MACE in patients in 〈60° group, compared to one-stent technique.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第12期2083-2088,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 coronary bifurcation lesions bifurcation angle major adverse cardiac events ROC curve coronary bifurcation lesions bifurcation angle major adverse cardiac events ROC curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献2

共引文献4

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部