期刊文献+

胚胎第3天形态与非整倍体的相关性研究 被引量:3

The relationship between Day-3 embryo morphology and aneuploid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用荧光原位杂交技术(FISH)对24枚冷冻胚胎以及38枚不适合移植的废弃胚胎的8种染色体(13、16、18、21、22、15、X和Y)分两轮行植入前遗传学筛查(PGS),以分析胚胎形态学与染色体异常之间的关系。随着胚胎碎片比例的增加,染色体正常胚胎的比例在下降。在8细胞胚胎和非8细胞胚胎组中,正常胚胎比例分别为44.4%和34.8%(P>0.05)。卵裂球大小均匀的胚胎中,正常胚胎率为47.8%,高于卵裂球大小不均匀胚胎的正常胚胎率18%(P<0.05)。根据现有胚胎形态学特征来评估胚胎染色体的情况,仍存在一定的局限性。 To apply two rounds of FISH in 62 embryos to screen 8 chromosomes:13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y, and to analyse the relationship between Day-3 embryo morphology and aneuploid. With the increasing of frag- ments ratio, normal chromosome embryos were decreasing. The ratio of normal chromosome embryos in 8 cells embryos group and non-8 cells group was 44.4% and 34. 8% respectively( P 〉 0.05 ). Normal chromosome embryos ratio in embryos containing even blastomeres was higher than that of uneven embryos ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Selecting embry- os according to criterion morphological characteristics of chromosomes at present still has some limitations.
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第7期868-870,共3页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽高校省级自然科学基金研究重点项目(编号:KJ2009A77)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Munn6 S, Ary J, Zouves C, et al. Wide range of chromosome ab- normalities in the embryos of young egg donors [ J ]. Reprod Bi- omed Online,2006, 12(6) :340 - 6.
  • 2Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities and their lelationship to mor- phology and development of human embryos [ J ]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2006, 12(2) :234 -53.
  • 3Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Diagnosis of major chromo- some anenploidies in human preimplantation embryos [ J ]. Hum Reprod,1993,8(12) :2185 - 91.
  • 4Munn6 S, Tornkin G, Cohen J. Selection of embryos by morphology is less effective than by a combination of aneuploidy testing and morphology observations [ J ]. Fertil Sterility,2009,91 (3) :943 - 5.
  • 5Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Coils P, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gen- der[ J]. Fertil Steri1,2011,95 ( 2 ) :520 - 3.
  • 6Lopes da Costa L, Chagas e Silva J, Robalo Silva J, et al. Super- ovulatory response, embryo quality and fertility after treatment with different gonadotrophins in native cattle [ J ]. Theriogenology ,2001, 56(1) :65 -77.
  • 7Ziebe S, Lundin K, Left A, et al. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13,16,18,21,22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human ooeytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18 (12) : 2575 -81.
  • 8Moayeri S E, Alien R B, Brewster W R, et al. Day-3 embryo morphology predicts euploidy among older subjects[ J ]. Fertil Ster- il,2008,89(1) :118 -23.

同被引文献33

  • 1李刚,孙莹璞,金海霞.植入前遗传学诊断中四种卵裂球固定方法的比较[J].生殖与避孕,2006,26(7):440-442. 被引量:8
  • 2MAGLI MC, GIANAROLI L, FERRARETI AP, et al. Embryomorphology and development are dependent on the chromosomecomplement[J]. Fertil Steril, 2007, 87: 534-541.
  • 3LIU JQ, ZHUANG GL, LONG XL, et. The research of preim-plantation aneuploidy screening with 13,18,21,X,Y probes[J]. TheJournal of practical medicine, 2008, 24(15): 2554-2556.
  • 4MUNNE S, SERENA C, COLLS P, et al. Maternal age, mor-phology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos[J]. Reprod Biomed, 2007, 14: 628-634.
  • 5HARPER JC,COONEN E, DE RYCKE M, et al. What next forpreimplantation genetic screening(PGS). A position statement fromthe ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee[J]. Hum Reprod,2010,25: 821-823.
  • 6GAYANE A, AMANDER TC. Aneuploidy and early human em-bryo development^]. Hum Mol Genet, 2008, 17: R10-R15.
  • 7MUNNE S, BAHCXE M,SANDALINAS M,et al. Differences inchromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to firsttrimesteifj]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2004,8: 81 -90.
  • 8HAO Y, ZHOU P, ZHANG ZG, et al. The correlation of D3embryo morphology and aneuploidy[J]. Acta Universitatis Medici-nalis Anhui,2012,47(7):868-870.
  • 9LI G, SUN YP,JIN HX. The comparation of four different fixingmethods of blastomeres [J]. Reproduction&contraception, 2006, 26(7): 440-442.
  • 10SANTIAGO MUNN, DAGAN WELLS, JACQUES COHEN. Tech-nology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to im-prove assisted reproduction outcomes[J]. Fertility and Sterility, 2010,94(2): 408-429.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部