期刊文献+

应用Coflex棘突间置入物治疗腰椎退行性疾病近期效果观察 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]评估应用Coflex棘突间置入物治疗腰椎退行性疾病近期临床疗效。[方法]对本组2008年6月~2010年6月以来应用Coflex手术治疗的28例患者的临床资料进行回顾性总结分析。其中男性19例,女性9例;年龄44~65岁,平均为50.2岁。行微创减压+Coflex置入者24例,行椎间融合内固定+融合节段上方Coflex置入术者4例,置入物置入L3~4间隙6例,L4~5间隙18例,L5S1节段4例。所有患者均获随访,随访时间18个月。术后应用Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index,ODI)、视觉模拟(visual analogue painscore,VAS)评分及影像学检查对临床疗效进行评价。[结果]手术时间80~190 min,平均120.5 min。术后椎间隙高度得到恢复,末次随访高度未见明显丢失;VAS评分由术前的(7.9±1.1)分减至术后1年随访的(2.62±0.7)分;ODI由术前的(58.2±9.6)%减至术后18个月随访的(26.8±3.4)%,在随访期间VAS评分及ODI均得到明显恢复,与术前相比均有显著性差异(P<0.001)。[结论]严格掌握适应证,应用Coflex棘突间置入物治疗腰椎退行性疾病可以获得满意的临床疗效和保留一定的腰椎活动度,近期疗效满意。
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第13期1245-1247,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献84

  • 1钱宇,范顺武,方向前,胡月正,顾传龙.下腰椎椎间孔形态与椎间盘高度丢失的相关性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):536-540. 被引量:24
  • 2胡有谷.腰椎间盘退变的MRI诊断[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2005,41(3):189-191. 被引量:12
  • 3乐增年,欧阳甲,Allen Carl.腰椎小关节螺钉内固定[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(23):1837-1838. 被引量:1
  • 4Dickerman RD, Reynolds AS, Zigler J, et al. Adjacent-segment degeneration [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine,2009,2 : 177.
  • 5Etebar S, Cahill DW. Rish factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine, 1999,2 : 163 - 169.
  • 6Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent-segment degeneration in the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Bone joint Surg ( Am), 2004,86 : 1497 - 1503.
  • 7焦根龙.115例20~30岁正常国人腰椎数据测量与其临床意义[D].中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库,2008,3.
  • 8Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2009,11 : 1637 - 1643.
  • 9Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degeneration lumbar spinal disorder[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1995,6:464 - 473.
  • 10Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,3 : 167 - 172.

共引文献59

同被引文献86

  • 1Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, et al. A 10 - year follow - up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation E J ]. Spine, 2003, 28 ( 13 ) : 1390 - 1395.
  • 2Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[ J~. J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3 ) :255 - 261.
  • 3Kelly MP, Mok JM, Berven S. Dynamic constructs for spinal fusion: an evidence - based review [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010,41 (2) :203 -215.
  • 4Griffith JF. Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervene - bral disc degeneration [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2007,32 ( 24 ) :708 -712.
  • 5Min JH, Jang JS, Jung B, et al. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech ,2008,21 (5) :305 -309.
  • 6Xiao PX, Hang LC, Hong BC, et al. Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery[ J]. Spine ,2013,38 (7) :597 - 608.
  • 7Turunen V, Nyyss6nen T, Miettinen H, et al. Lumbar instrumented posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthetic and failed back patients: a long - term follow - up study spanning 11 - 13 years [ J 1. Eur Spine J,2012,21 ( 11 ) : 2140 -2148.
  • 8Adeh D, Samani J, Kim WK, et al. Coflex intempinous stabilization : clinical and radiographic results from an international muhieenter ret- rospective study [ J ]. Paradigm Spine J,2007,1 ( 1 ) : 1 - 5.
  • 9Umehara S, Zindriek MR, Patwardhan AG, et al. The biomechanieal effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments [ J ] . Spine, 2000,25 (13) : 1617-1624.
  • 10Kim K, Lee SH, Chan S. Adjacent segment disease after interbody fu- sion and pedicle screw fixations for isolated L4,5 spondylolisthesis:a minimum five - year follow - up [ J 1. Spine, 2010,35 ( 6 ) : 625 - 634.

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部