摘要
"场"是功能载体的存在,可为分析艺术价值、生活情趣、社会要求提供基本范畴;"场"也是意义实体的存在,其根本表现是具有场规则。艺术场、生活场、社会场的场规则分别被揭示为追求独立性、娱乐性、和谐性。艺术场、生活场、社会场的信任冲突和障碍均源自于三种不同场规则的内涵指向,由此又从更广阔的方面构成艺术价值、生活情趣、社会要求的不包容。最终的结论是要实现艺术价值、生活情趣、社会要求的包容,就要突破场域信任障碍。
The "field" is a carrier of function, so it can provide basic categories with analyses of art-value, life-interests and social-demanding. At the same time, the "field" is also an exist of meaning entity whose fundamental representation is having a rule-field. As a new conception, the art-field, life-field and social- field could be respectively proclaimed as a purchasing of independence, entertainment and harmony after refining. The trust-clash and obstacle between the rules of art-field, life-field and social-field all result from three different directions of rule-field, so they again compose unforgiveness of art-value, life-interests and social-demanding from more vast aspects. In the end, the conclusions are that it is important to break the obstacles of field-trust if we need to realize the forgiveness of art-value, life-interests and social-de- manding.
出处
《新疆艺术学院学报》
2012年第2期69-74,共6页
Journal of Xinjiang Arts University
基金
江西省社会科学"十一五"(2010年)规划课题"公共舆论事件的社会信任建构研究"(编号:10SH45)之系列成果