期刊文献+

选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术治疗内痔的临床研究 被引量:19

Selective superior hemorrhoidal mucosa resection and anastomosis in the treatment of hemorrhoids clinical research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察和评价选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术(TST)治疗内痔的临床疗效。方法采用前瞻性、随机、对照的研究方法,将120例Ⅱ~Ⅳ度内痔患者随机分为TST组和PPH组,分别采用TST术和PPH术,比较观察两组患者的手术用时、术中出血量和术后便血、肿物脱出、肛门疼痛、尿潴留、肛门功能、吻合口狭窄等情况,并根据疗效评分标准进行评价。结果两组临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但TST组在术中出血量、术后肛门疼痛、尿潴留、肛门功能、吻合口狭窄等方面明显优于PPH组(P<0.05)。结论 TST对Ⅱ~Ⅳ度内痔患者的治疗效果与PPH相似,且对肛门功能损伤小,术中出血少,术后疼痛轻,并发症少,能显著降低吻合口狭窄发生率。 Objective Observation and evaluation of selective superior hemorrhoidal mucosa resection and anastomosis for the treatment of hemorrhoids disease clinical curative effect. Methods A prospective, ran- domized, controlled study method, 120 cases of [[ ~ IV degree hemorrhoidal disease patients were random- ly divided into A group (test group) and group B (control group}, respectively, using TST technique and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids anastomosis (PPH), compared with those observed in two groups of patients with operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative blood in the stool, tumor prolapse, anal pain, urinary retention, anal function, anastomotic stenosis and so on, and according to the grading standards for evaluation of curative effect. Results Comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant ( P ~ 0.05 ), two groups of operation time, the difference was not statistically significant ( P ~0.05), but TST groups in intraoperative blood loss, post- operative anal pain, urinary retention, anal function, anastomotic strictures are significantly better than that of group PPH ( P d0.05). Conclusion TST on [[ ~ IV degree haemorrhoids therapeutic effects in pa- tients with PPH were similar, and the anal function less injury, less bleeding, less postoperative pain, less complications, can significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.
出处 《结直肠肛门外科》 2012年第2期86-89,共4页 Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
关键词 选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术 痔上黏膜环切吻合术 Hemorrhoidal disease Selective superior hemorrhoidal mucosa resection and anastomosis Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids anastomosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1任东林,罗湛滨,赵杰.吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合术1000例临床总结[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2005,11(3):204-205. 被引量:28
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2138
  • 3中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组 中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会 中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会.痔临床诊治指南(草案).中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463.
  • 4Mehigan BJ,Monson JRT,Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2000,355(9206):782- 785.
  • 5Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling for haemorrhoidectomy[J]. Lancet,2000,355(9206) :768-769.
  • 6Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapledwith open haemorrhoid- ectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2001,88(5) : 669.
  • 7Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, et al. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation alter STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,7(3):148-153.
  • 8Peseatori M, Dodi G,Salafia C, et al. Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation[J].Int J Coloreetal Dis, 2005,20 (1) : 83-85.
  • 9Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia R. Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicated by hematoma of the posterior vaginal wall[J]. Tech Coloproctol,2006,10(4):361-363.
  • 10LONGO A.Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device:a new procedure[M].Rome:Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998:3.

共引文献79

同被引文献145

引证文献19

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部