美国高等教育增值评价模式的兴起与应用被引量：54

The Rise of Value-added Assessment Mode and Application in American Higher Education

导出

摘要为提升本科教育质量、回应社会问责,一种重新回归学生本位,关注学生成长和发展,评测高等教育为学生带来影响的增值评价运动正在美国大学兴起。增值评价主要测量学生从进入大学到毕业期间所发生的变化,目前可运用直接法、间接法、事后法三种方法来测量。学生的增值是学校教育质量的根本体现,增值评价改变了大学以往过多以"输入"为标准、以经验判断为主要依据的评价模式,构建起了以学习者为中心,以可显现证据为基础,以教育过程、学生学习结果为核心的一套新的教育质量评价体系,是对以往高等教育评估模式的超越,也是美国大学回归大学之道的根本体现。 The value added assessment movement has arisen at the universities in the US, which is to evaluate the impact of higher education. Being student-oriented, it pays close attention to the growth and development of university students and thus aims at enhan- cing the quality of undergraduate education and responding to social accountability. Value- added assessment chiefly measures the change students have undergone during their under- graduate years. Three methods can be applied in the measurement： they are direct value-add- ed assessment, indirect value-added assessment and applied value-added assessment. The added value of students is a manifestation of the quality of higher education. Value-added as- sessment, as a new education quality evaluation system, centers on the process of education and the learning outcomes of students. It goes beyond the previous empirical assessment

作者刘海燕

机构地区南京审计学院高等教育研究所

出处《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期96-101,共6页 Journal of Higher Education

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC880086)

关键词增值评价本科教育教育评价评价模式 value-added assessment undergraduate education education assessment as-sessment rood

分类号 G40-058.1 [文化科学—教育学原理] G649 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1BERDAH R O. Statewide Coordination of Higher Ed- ucation[M]. American Council on Education,1971.
2BURKE J C. Achieving Accountability in Higher Edu cation: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market De-mands[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,2005.
3章建石.增值评价法-关注学生的实际进步.评鉴双月刊,2007,(8):3-3.
4AST1N A W. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education[M]. San Francisco. Jossey Bass, 1985:23.
5HARVEY L, GREEN D. Defining Quality[J]. As- sessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1993,18 (1):9 34.
6BENNETT D C. Assessing Quality in Higher Educa tion-Perspectives[J/OL]. Liberal Education, 2001 : 3 4. http://www, findarticles, com/p/articles/mi _ m0NKR/is 2 87/ai_88581415.
7FELDMAN K A, NEWCOMB T M. The Impact of College on Student [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1970.
8COLEMAN J S, et. al. Equality of Educational Op portunity [M]. Washington, DC. US Government Printing Office, 1966.
9ASTIN A W. Four critical years[M]. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1977.
10PACE C R. Achievement and the Quality of Student Effort[R]. Washington, DC. National Commission on Excellence in Education,1982.