期刊文献+

网络舆情冲突类言语行为研究 被引量:2

Research on Speech Act of Online Public Opinions Conflict
原文传递
导出
摘要 言语行为分析是网络舆情分析中一个重要的环节,对于机器大规模自动分析、识别和刻画网络舆情具有重要意义;矛盾冲突则是网络舆情监管需要重点关注的一类任务。以网络舆情的冲突类言语行为分析为例,初步尝试建立了一个适合中文网络论坛环境的冲突类言语行为分类体系。同时提出了相应的自动化分类算法,并比较不同特征集(提示词、n-grams、句法特征和结构特征)解决分类问题时的效果。实验结果表明,本文所提方法可以获得一个较为满意的分类效果,同时也证实新引入的句法特征和结构特征在解决言语行为分类问题上具有积极作用。 Speech act analysis plays a critical role in the analysis of online public opinion, which is significant for the task of automated analyzing and identifying conflicts in large scale public opinion texts from the Internet. Since conflict management is one of the major tasks in public opinion supervision, this research thus first builds speech act taxonomy for conflicting public opinions in Chinese context and then proposes an automated classification algorithm. We also compare the effect of different feature set (cue phrase, n-grams, syntactic and structural) on classification performance. Experiment results show that the proposed method structural feature provides a satisfactory classification effect, and the new introduced syntactic and sets are effective in improving performance.
作者 李嘉 张朋柱
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期1076-1083,共8页 Information Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71001038)
关键词 言语行为 自动分类 网络舆情 冲突 speech act automated classification online public opinion conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1徐晓林,王子文.关于把握网络舆情主导权问题研究[J].管理世界,2010,26(4):183-184. 被引量:20
  • 2Prasad R, Walker M. Training a dialogue act tagger for human-human and human-computer travel dialogues [C]. Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Dis- course and Dialogue. Philadelphia:Pennsylvania, 2002.
  • 3Fernandez R, Ginzburg J, Lappin S. Using machine learning for non-sentential utterance classification [C]. Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Dis- course and Dialogue. Lisbon:Portugal, 2005.
  • 4Lendvai P, van den Bosch A, Krahmer E. Machine learning for shallow interpretation of user utterances in spoken dialogue systems [C]. Proceedings of the EA- CL-03 Workshop on Dialogue Systems: Interaction, Adaptation and Styles of Management. Budapest:Hun- gary, 2003.
  • 5Alien J, Core M. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog act markup in several layers, in Unpublished manuscript[C].USA: Discourse Research Initiative,1997.
  • 6Jurafsky D, Shriberg E, Biasca D. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annota- tion Coders Manual[C]. NJ:University of Colorado, In-stitute of Cognitive Science,1997.
  • 7Godfrey J J, Holliman E C, MeDaniel J. SWITCH- BOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and de- velopment [C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Process- ing, USA:San Francisco, CA, 1992.
  • 8Levin L, Ries K, Thyme-Gobbel A, Lavie A. Tagging of speech acts and dialogue games in Spanish call home [C]. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop "Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging",NJ:Somer- set, 1998.
  • 9Reithinger N, Maier E. Utilizing statistical dialogue act processing in Verbmobil [C]. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. Morristown, N J, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1995.
  • 10Gerassimenko O, Hennoste T, Koit M, R bis A, Strand- son K, Valdisoo M, Vutt E. Annotated dialogue cor- pus as a language resource: an experience of building the Estonian dialogue corpus [C]. Proceedings of the 1st Baltic Conference on Human Language Technolo- gies, Riga:Latvia, 2004.

二级参考文献24

  • 1李欣苗,张朋柱,唐协平.基于机械产品的团队创新支持系统研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(16):1479-1483. 被引量:1
  • 2李欣苗,张朋柱.综合集成过程中研讨信息记录模式的识别方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(2):24-29. 被引量:1
  • 3张朋柱,汪应洛.DSS信息组织技术的现状与未来[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(10):18-24. 被引量:9
  • 4程少川,王刊良,席酉民.基于行为的思维分析和DSS中信息组织方式的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(11):25-30. 被引量:7
  • 5Bolwijn P T, Kumpe T. Manufacturing in the 1990s-productivity, flexibility and innovation [J]. Long Range Planning, 1990, 23: 44-57.
  • 6Michael P, Gallupe R B. Knowledge creation in focus groups: Can group technologies help? [J]. Information & Management, 2000, 38: 47-58.
  • 7Schilling M A, Hill C. Managing the new product development process : Strategic imperatives [J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1998, 12(3): 67-81.
  • 8Morgan D L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Qualitative Research Methods [M]. Newbury Park : Sage Publications, Series 16, 1988.
  • 9Nunamaker J F, Briggs R O, Romano N C. Meeting Environments of the Future : Meeting to Plan Work or Meeting to Do Work ? [C]. Proceedings of GroupWare'94, Europe, 1994, 6 : 521-545.
  • 10Trauth E M, Jessup L M. Understanding computer-mediated discussions positives and interpretive analyses of group support system use[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(1):43-79.

共引文献26

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部