期刊文献+

On the Rebuilding of Cultural Identity and Orthodoxy: A Brief Socio-historical Analysis of China's Social Transformation since the Ming and Qing

On the Rebuilding of Cultural Identity and Orthodoxy: A Brief Socio-historical Analysis of China's Social Transformation since the Ming and Qing
原文传递
导出
摘要 The socio-historical analysis of "Chinese Modernity" and "Chinese Cultural Identity" within the context of social transformation, by restoring the origin of modernity as a "historical event" since late Qing, leads to the finding that "the Deng Zheng-lai Problem" pinpoints the current crisis of cultural identity and the loss of Orthodoxy(daotong) which infects contemporary China. It is necessary to build and shape the mode of cultural identity in response to the pressure of rightness, creating "the identity of hybridity" by negotiating the classic tradition with the socialist tradition and a partial western tradition. By observing "the Deng- Hui frameworks" (the frameworks formulated by Deng Zheng-lai, Wang Hui, Deng Xiao-mang and Qin Hui), we should neither blindly return to the classic tradition nor uncritically resort to the Western resources in our attempt at rebuilding cultural identity; instead, one mode of a "New Civilization" might arise in the sense of what Liang Qi-chao regards as cutting across both China and the West.
作者 Sun Guo--dong
出处 《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》 2012年第2期36-59,共24页 复旦人文社会科学论丛(英文版)
关键词 social transformation modernity cultural identity theOrthodoxy(daotong) "the Deng-Hui frameworks" 当代中国 文化认同 社会历史 社会转型 明清 历史事件 传统 西方
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
  • 2Ci, Ji-wei. 1994. Dialectic of the Chinese Revolution: From Utopianism to Hedonism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 3Deng,Xiao-mang邓晓芒.2008.Neo-criticism新批判主义.Beijing:Peking University Press北京大学出版社.
  • 4Deng,Xiao-mang邓晓芒.2010. Neu, Critique of Confitcian Ethics儒家伦理新批判.Chongqing: Chongqing University Press重庆大学出版社.
  • 5Deng Zheng-lai邓正来.2006. Whither Chinese Jurisprudence?中国法学向何处去.Beijing:The Commercial Press商务印书馆.
  • 6Habermas, Jurgen 1986. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • 7Habermas, Jurgen 1989. "The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies. " Ed. J. Habermas. The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians' Debate. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.
  • 8Habermas, Jurgen 1991. "A Reply. " Ed. Axel Honneth &Hans Joas. Communicative Actions: Essays on Jurgen Habermas's The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. Jeremy Gaines &Doris L. Jones. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 9Huang, Philip C.C. 2007. "Whither Chinese Law. " Modern China 33.2:163-194.
  • 10Kekes, John. 1997. Against Liberalism. Comell University Press.

二级参考文献49

  • 1朱振.“知识权力”之下的知识分子[J].政法论坛,2005,23(6):73-75. 被引量:4
  • 2邓正来.中国法律哲学当下基本使命的前提性分析——作为历史性条件的世界结构[J].法学研究,2006,28(5):99-110. 被引量:59
  • 3季卫东.为法理大辩论提供两个分析框架[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):50-53. 被引量:5
  • 4林来梵.《一个非法(学)的预言--究竟“中国法学向何处去”》,载“法律博客”,http://linlaifan.fyfz.cn/art/105238.htm,2010年10月9日.
  • 5苏德超.《哲学翻译的新探索》,载《武汉大学报》2004年4月9日.
  • 6孙国东.《权利本位范式及其社会-历史限度--当下中国主流法学/法制的“新自南主义”倾向》,载浙江大学光华法学院编.《转型期法治--全同研讨会论文集》,2009年.第184-202页.
  • 7朱苏力.《司法制度的变迁》,http://www.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/wk_wzdetails.asp?id=4661,最后访问于2006年10月27日.
  • 8高全喜.《中国现代法学之道:价值、对象与方法》,载邓正来主编.《中国书评》第6辑,上海:世纪出版集团,2007年.
  • 9孙国东.《切勿让“学术为本”流于一种意识形态--就学术与政治和中国法律哲学的建构答魏敦友教授》,法律博客,http://sunguodong.fyfz.cn/art/193919.htm,最后访问于2010年10月9日.
  • 10萨伊德.《东方学》[M].北京:三联书店,1999..

共引文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部