期刊文献+

禾谷孢囊线虫侵染对小麦根部防御酶的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Cereal Cyst Nematode Infection on Defense Enzyme Activity of Wheat Root
原文传递
导出
摘要 以抗禾谷孢囊线虫(Heterodera avenae Wollenweber,cereal cyst nematode,CCN)小麦品系‘E-10’和易感材料‘中国春’为材料,通过人工接种禾谷孢囊线虫二龄幼虫,并在接种线虫后测定根部防御酶苯丙氨酸转氨酶(PAL)和脂氧合酶(LOX)活力变化,研究抗感性材料对线虫侵染后防御酶的响应,以了解作物的抗虫机制.结果发现,‘E-10’和‘中国春’防御酶活力变化存在显著差异,‘E-10’在线虫侵染后6 h,LOX酶活增强,在24 h达到最大值,酶活变化比‘中国春’迅速,暗示‘E-10’启动线虫防御反应更为有效直接.此外,发现小麦在接种线虫后会引起邻近未接种植株根部防御酶活力变化.‘E-10’在接种线虫后12 h,其接触组未接种材料根部PAL酶活增加0.9倍,LOX酶活增加1.1倍,并且‘E-10’未接种植株的酶活变化比‘中国春’更迅速,幅度更剧烈.表明可能有某些气态或挥发性物质参与了小麦防御线虫侵染过程,并且这种现象在抗感材料间差异显著.使用茉莉酸甲酯处理‘E-10’和‘中国春’,小麦根部PAL和LOX酶活并未产生与接触接种线虫材料相一致的变化,表明该气态或挥发性物质并非茉莉酸甲酯. Cereal cyst nematode,a soil-borne pest,is harmful to wheat and other cereal crops,but the mechanism of insectresistance is still unknown.In this study,the changes of defensive enzymes(PAL and LOX) in the roots of cereal cyst nematode(CCN) resistant and susceptible materials ‘E-10’ and ‘Chinese Spring’ were tested,respectively.It was found that the changes of the defensive enzymes were significantly different between resistant and susceptible materials.It implied that the defense of ‘E-10’ was triggered more quickly and effectively than that of ‘Chinese Spring’.The LOX activity of ‘E-10’ reached the highest level at 24 h after CCN infection with a increase of 0.8 times;while the LOX activity of ‘Chinese Spring’ rose to the highest level at 48 h with a increase of 1.0 times.The activity of defensive enzymes also changed in uninfected plants adjacent to the CCN infected plants,and significantly different between resistant and susceptible materials.After being infected by CCN,the PAL activity of ‘E-10’ in roots neighboring intact plant increased by 0.9 times at 12 h,and the LOX activity increased by 1.1 times at 12 h.The PAL activity of ‘Chinese Spring’ in neighboring intact plant roots increased by 0.6 times at 12 h,and the LOX activity increased 0.4 times at 48 h.These results suggested that some kind of gaseous or volatile organic compounds(VOCs) might be released from CCN infected plants and induced wheat systemic resistance.The PAL and LOX activities in roots of ‘E-10’ and ‘Chinese Spring’ dealt with methyl jasmonate were not consistent with those induced by CCN inoculated plants,which suggested that the gaseous or volatile organic compound was not methyl jasmonate.
出处 《应用与环境生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期359-363,共5页 Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology
基金 国家转基因生物新品种培育科技重大专项(No.2008ZX08009-003) 国家自然科学基金项目(No.30971903)资助~~
关键词 禾谷孢囊线虫 脂氧合酶 苯丙氨酸转氨酶 茉莉酸甲酯 小麦 cereal cyst nematode LOX PAL methyl jasmonate wheat
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1王明祖,雷智峰,肖炎农.小麦禾谷孢囊线虫寄生范围的研究[J].植物保护,1996,22(1):3-5. 被引量:20
  • 2江玲,王松凤,刘喜,陈亮明,刘世家,翟虎渠,万建民.优质水稻品种W017的耐贮藏特性[J].南京农业大学学报,2007,30(2):133-135. 被引量:11
  • 3Staswick P E. Plant hormones. In: Davies P J(ed). Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, (2nd ed). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Pub. 1995:179 - 187.
  • 4McConn M, Creelman R A, Bell E, Mullet J E, Browse J. Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of National Academy Science, USA, 1997,94: 5 473 - 5 477.
  • 5Cowan A K. Gotht R. Crotanoidgenetic and jasmoniate biosynthezing activity in a cell-free system. Physiology of Plant,1997,99:371 - 378.
  • 6Xu X Q, Zou Q. Effect of drought on lipoxygenase activity, ethylene and ethylene production in leaves of soybean plants. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1993,35: 31 - 37.
  • 7Meyer A, Miersch Q, Buttner C, Dathe W , Sembdner G. Occurrence of the plant growth regulator jasmonic acid in plants. J. Plant Growth Regulation, 1984,3:1 - 8.
  • 8Knofel H D, Bruckner C, Kramell R. Radioimunoassay for the natural plant growth regulator--jasmonic acid. Biochemistry Physiology Pflanzen, 1990,186: 387 - 394.
  • 9Quarrie S A, whitford P N, Appleford N E J. A monoclonal Antibodi to abscisic abcid in crude leave. Planta, 1988, 173:330-339.
  • 10Sembdnet G, Parthier B. The biochemistry and the physiological and molecular action of jasmonates. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Molecular Biology, 1993,44: 569 - 589.

共引文献72

同被引文献23

  • 1李荣花,陈捷,高增贵,唐保宏,刘军华.玉米纹枯病抗性与防御酶关系的研究[J].天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(4):32-36. 被引量:24
  • 2张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
  • 3李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2006.
  • 4Ehlting J, Hamberger B, Million-Rousseau R, et al. CytochromesP phenolic metabolism[j]. Phytochemistry Reviews,2006, 5 ;239-270.
  • 5Petkovsek M M, Siatnar A, Stampar F, et al. Phenolic compoundsin apple leaves after infection with apple scab[J]. Biologia Plantarum,2011,55(4):725-730.
  • 6Anand T,Bhaskaran R, Raguchander T, et al. Defense responsesof chilli fruits to Colletotrichum capsici and Altemaria altemate[S].Biologia Plantarum, 2009, 53(3) : 553-559.
  • 7Ahuja I,Kissen R, Bones A M. Phytoalexins in defense againstpathogens[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(2) : 73-90.
  • 8Zhan R L, Yang S J, Liu F, et al. First report of Fusariummanffferae in China causing mango malformation[J]. Plant Disease,2012,96(5): 762.
  • 9Prats E, Bazzalo M E, Le6n A, et al. Accumulation of solublephenolic compounds in sunflower capitula correlates withresistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J]. Euphytica, 2003,132:321-329.
  • 10Kiprovski B, Malencic D, Popovic M, et cd. Correlation betweenlipid peroxidation and phenolics content in leaves and roots ofsugar beet infected with RhizoctoniaPhytoparasitica,2013,DOI: 10.1007/sl2600-013-0352-7.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部