期刊文献+

应用因子分析法分析中文版成瘾严重程度指数量表的结构效度 被引量:1

ANALYZING CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE VERSION OF ADDICTION SEVERITY INDEX
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:在社区吸毒者中评估中文版成瘾严重程度指数量表(ASI-C)的结构效度。方法:使用因子分析的方法分析ASI-C量表的结构效度。结果:经因子分析共提取出11个公因子,与量表中原有7个分量表数目不符,但发现"毒品使用情况"分量表包括了3个公因子的变量;"精神状况"分量表包括了2个公因子的变量;"家庭社会关系"分量表包括了2个公因子的变量,其余4个分量表的变量分别由1个公因子的变量代表。结论:ASI-C具有可接受的结构效度。 Objective:To analyze construct validity of the Chinese version of Addiction Severity Index(ASI-C) among drug users in the community.Methods: Factor analysis was used to analyze construct validity of ASI-C.Results: Eleven common factors were extracted which were different from the original ASI scale.Further analysis revealed that the drug use subscale included variables from 3 common factors,the psychiatric subscale included variables from 2 common factors,the family/social relationship subscale included variables from 2 common factors.The other four subscales of ASI-C included variables only from 1 common factor respectively.Conclusion: ASI-C presented acceptable construct validity in a sample of drug users in the community.
出处 《中国药物依赖性杂志》 CAS CSCD 2012年第3期202-205,共4页 Chinese Journal of Drug Dependence
基金 国家自然科学基金(30800953)
关键词 中文版成瘾严重程度指数量表 结构效度 社区吸毒者 Chinese version of Addiction Severity Index construct validity community drugusers
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody G, et al. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index [J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1980,168:26-33.
  • 2Gerevieh J, Baeskai E, Ko J, et al. Reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the European Addiction Severity Index [ J]. PsvehoDathology. 2005.38:301 - 309.
  • 3EMCDDA. EMCDDA : Topics (A- Z) : Best practice : Evaluation Instruments Bank (EIB) : Instruments bank : Treatment evaluation instruments : Addiction Severity Index [ DB/OL ] [ 2005 -04 -04 ]. http ://www. emcdda, europa, eu/html, cfm/ index3538EN, html.
  • 4McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index [ J ]. J Subst Abuse Treat, 1992, 9 (3) :199 -213.
  • 5Luo W, Wu Z, Wei X. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the addiction severity index [ J ]. J Aequir Immune Defic Syndr, 2010,53 Suppl 1 :S121 - S125.
  • 6Lisa A. The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behavior and criminality : a meta - analysis [ J]. Addiction, 1998,93:515 - 532.
  • 7中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2000:75-78.
  • 8The University of Pennsylvania/Veterans Administration Center for studies of addiction. Addiction severity index: manual and question by question guide[ M]. Philadelphia,USA: Treatment Research Institute, 1990.
  • 9McGahan PL, Griffth JA, Parente R, et al. Addiction severity index: composite scores manual[ M ]. Philadelphia: Treatment Research Institute, 1986.
  • 10Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2005.

共引文献215

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部