2McArthur K, Fan Y,Pei Z, et al. Optimising outcome assess-ment to improve quality and efficiency of stroke trials[J]. ExpertRev Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res, 2014, 14(1): 101-111.
3Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, et al. Functional outcomemeasures in contemporary stroke trials[J]. Int J Stroke, 2009, 4(3): 200-205.
4Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ, Xenakis JJ, et al. The prognostic valueof the modified Rankin Scale score for long-term survival afterfirst-ever stroke. Results from the Athens Stroke Registry[J].Cerebrovasc Dis, 2008, 26(4): 381-387.
5Knapp P,Hewison J. Disagreement in patient and carer assess-ment of functional abilities after stroke[J]. Stroke, 1999, 30(5):934-938.
6Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales instroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations[J]. Clin Interv Ag-ing, 2013, B: 201-211.
7Quinn TJ, McArthur K, Dawson J, et al. Reliability of structuredmodified Rankin Scale assessment[J]. Stroke, 2010,41(12):602-603.
8Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of themodified Rankin Scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: aliterature review and synthesis[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(3):1091-1096.
9Wilson JTL, Hareendran A, Hendry A, et al. Reliability of themodified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a struc-tured interview[J]. Stroke,2005, 36(4): 777-781.
10Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, et al. Reliability of the modi-fied Rankin Scale: a systematic review[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(10):3393-3395.
