期刊文献+

轿车双侧顶盖抗压性能的虚拟实验评估 被引量:1

Virtual Testing for the Assessment of Double-sided Roof Crush Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了小型汽车在双侧顶盖抗压试验中的安全性能,评估了不同滚动角及俯仰角组合对顶盖强度的影响,并分析了顶盖近侧及远侧之间抗压性能的差异.通过顶盖抗压试验对汽车的有限元模型进行验证;基于不同滚动角度及俯仰角度进行全因子正交试验设计.虚拟试验结果表明:俯仰角和滚动角的变化对顶盖抗压性能有显著影响,在127mm(5inch)的压缩行程中,当俯仰角相同时,在10°~45°滚动角范围内随着角度增加顶盖两侧强度持续下降;而当滚动角相同时,在5°~15°俯仰角范围内随着角度增加顶盖两侧强度逐渐减弱.总体来看,近侧顶盖的强度性能明显高于远侧. This paper investigated the safety behavior of a small car subjected to double-sided roof crush test, assessing the effect of different pitch and roll angle combinations on the roof crush strength and eval- uating the difference in strength between near and far sides. A finite element model of Ford Fiesta was ini- tially validated against the roof crush test, and was subsequently employed in virtual testing according to a full factorial method DOE (design of experiments) based on the variations of roll and pitch angles. The re- sults have shown that the roll and pitch angles are a function of roof strength and greatly influence the o- verall collapse behavior. Within a 127 mm crush distance (5 inches), the strength of the two-sided roof de- creases as the roll angle varies from 10° to 45° with a fixed pitch angle; the strength of the two-sided roof decreases as the roll angle increases from 5° to 15° with a fixed roll angle. Furthermore, the roof on the near side generally performs better and more strongly than the far side.
出处 《湖南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期40-46,共7页 Journal of Hunan University:Natural Sciences
基金 教育部长江学者与创新团队发展计划资助项目(531105050037) 湖南大学汽车车身先进设计制造国家重点实验室自主课题(61075004) CSC国家留学基金委资助项目
关键词 翻滚 车顶抗压 抵抗力 双侧试验 俯仰角 滚动角 rollover roof crush resistance force double-sided test pitch angle roll angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1EIGEN A M. Review of NMVCCS rollover variables in support of rollover reeonstruetion[R]. Washington,DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2010.
  • 2MANDELL S P, KAUFMAN R, MACK C D,etal. Mortality and injury patterns associated with roof crush in rollover crashes [J] Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42 (4): 1326-1331.
  • 3CHIRWA E C, STEPHENSON R, BATZER S. Review of the Jordan rollover system (JRS) vis-a-vis other dynamic crash test devices [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2010, 15 (5): 553-569.
  • 4FMVSS216 Federal motor vehicle safety standards [S]. Washington,DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2009.
  • 5FRIEDMAN D, NASH C. Advanced roof design for rollover protection [C]//The 17th Proceedings of ESV Conference. Amsterdam: North Atlantic Treaty Organization Committee, 2001.
  • 6MAO M, CHIRWA E C, CHEN T. Static and dynamic roof crush simulation using LS-DYNA3D [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2004, 9 (5):495-504.
  • 7FRIEDMAN D, NASH C E, BISH J. Results from two sided quasi-static (M216) and repeatable dynamic rollover tests (JRS) relative to FMVSS 216 [C] //The 20th Proceedings of ESV Conference. Lyon: North Atlantic Treaty Organization Committee, 2007.
  • 8杨济匡,覃祯员,王四文,顾国荣.轿车侧面柱碰撞结构响应与乘员损伤研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(1):23-28. 被引量:15
  • 9杨济匡,吴亚军,张斌.汽车侧面碰撞中头胸部安全气囊的优化研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,37(1):23-28. 被引量:17
  • 10MAO M, CHIRWA E C, CHEN T. Numerical analysis of small European vehicle under rollover condition [J]. International Journal of Automobile Engineering, Part D, 2005, 219 (10) : 1369-1379.

二级参考文献19

  • 1张君媛,林逸,华伟,张敏.基于随机模拟的汽车安全带系统约束效能优化[J].汽车工程,2004,26(3):311-313. 被引量:9
  • 2曹立波,王鹏,杜文建,胡敏锋.基于乘员损伤分析的轿车侧面碰撞安全性研究[J].北京汽车,2007(3):17-21. 被引量:6
  • 3杨济匡,李凡,李莉.车辆-行人碰撞中颅脑伤及动力学响应的研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(7):30-34. 被引量:11
  • 4AMCNEIL L, HOLZNER D R M, SCHOENEBURG D R R, et al. Current worldwide side impact activities-divergence versus harmonisation and the possible effect on future car design [C]//The 19th ESV Conference. Washington D C,2005, 05- 0077.
  • 5STEPHANIE Schneider, MINORU Niwa. Effectiveness of thorax and pelvis side airbag for improved side impact protection[C]// The 19th ESV Conference. Washington D C,2005, 05-0273.
  • 6TNO Company. MADYMO theory manual version621 [M]. Netherlands : 2004.
  • 7LIAO Xing-tao, LI Qing, YANG Xu-jing, et al. Muhiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model[J]. Struct Multidise Optim,2008, 35: 561--569.
  • 8TYLKOI. S,GERMANL A,DALMOTAS D,et al. Improving side impact rotection: response of the ES-2RE and worldsid in a proposed harmonized pole test[C] // The 2006 IRCOBI Con ference. Madrid:International Research Council on the Biome- chanies of Injury , 2006 : 213- 224.
  • 9NHTS A. The new car assessment program suggested approa -ches for future program enhancements[R]. Washington:Na- tional Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2007.
  • 10EURO-NCAP. Euro NCAP pole side impact testing protocol version4. 1[M]. Belgium: European New Car Assessment Pro- gramme, 2004:1- 11.

共引文献28

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部