针刺结合闪罐及碘离子导入治疗Bell麻痹30例

Treating Bell's Palsy with Needling,Quick Cupping and Iodine Iontophoresis: A Report of 30 Cases

目的:观察针刺结合闪罐及碘离子导入治疗Bell麻痹的疗效。方法:将60例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例,治疗组采用基础治疗结合针刺、闪罐及碘离子导入;对照组选用基础治疗结合常规药物治疗。分别观察治疗前后面神经麻痹程度分级评分情况及2组患者的疗效。结果:治疗组痊愈14例,占46.7%;显效9例,占30%;有效6例,占20%;无效1例,占3.3%;总有效率96.7%。对照组痊愈9例,占30%;显效6例,占20%;有效11例,占36.7%;无效4例,占13.3%;总有效率86.7%(P<0.05)。治疗前2组患者面神经麻痹程度分级评分比较P>0.05,治疗后治疗组与对照组评分比较P<0.05,治疗组组内比较P<0.01,对照组组内比较P<0.05。结论:针刺结合闪罐及碘离子导入、常规药物均能有效治疗Bell麻痹,但针刺结合闪罐及碘离子导入的疗效较好。

Objective： To observe therapeutic effects of needling combined with quick cupping and iodine iontophoresis in treating Bell＇s palsy. Method： Sixty patients were randomly assigned into treatment group and control group equally. Treatment group were given with basic treatment, needling, quick cupping and iodine iontophoresis; control group received basic treatment and conventional drug therapy. Scores of facial paralysis classification and curative effects of both groups were observed respectively before and after the treatment. Result： Fourteen cases were cured in treatment group and took up 46.7%; nine cases effective significantly and occupied 30%; six cases effective and 20%, one case ineffective and 3.3%; total effective rate was 96.7%. nine cases cured in control group and reached to 30%; six cases effective obviously and 20%; 11 cases effective and 36.7%, four cases ineffective and 13.3%; total effective rate was 86.7%（P 〈0.05）. Comparison of facial paralysis classification between both groups before the treatment showed P〉0.05, comparisons of scores between treatment group and control group after the treatment indicated P 〈0.05, comparison in the treatment group suggested P 〈0.01, comparison in the control group demonstrated P 〈0.05. Conclusion： Needling combined with quick cupping, iodine iontophoresis and conventional drug therapy are effective in treating Bell＇s pasly and needling, quick cupping combined with iodine iontophoresis the best effects.